Celtic banter 65354


Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

03 Jan 2024 15:43:49
If it came down to a one v one for a striker, who would you choose? Shankland or Miovski. Just reading that the sheep are looking for offers no less than £5m for their own man.

Agree1 Disagree0

03 Jan 2024 16:17:06
I'd take Shankland purely because he is Scottish.

03 Jan 2024 16:25:24
Shankland better goalscorer yes he's 4 year older but miovski would have to score 34 goals a season to equal shanklands total just now. don't see him capable of that.

03 Jan 2024 16:47:46
Would take Miovski, he's more mobile than Shankland and a very good finisher, always been impressed with him every time I've seen him play.

03 Jan 2024 16:49:44
I think both Hearts and the sheep will price us out of either player, as i would not pay 5 mil for Miovski or Shankland, nothing like that. Neither will become anymore valuable than that.

03 Jan 2024 17:01:54
personally I would take miovski as I think he would suit our style of play better and he would bring more to the team Yes both of them are goalscorers and are in fine form for both their clubs . But for me it's miovski . Regardless which either one we get if we get any of them we are going to have stump up a few pounds for them . That's why I think miovski is the better option as he will have a sell on value as he is only 24 .

03 Jan 2024 17:55:00
The leagues top scorer Shankland has 13 goals and 18 in all competitions. Miovski has 9 league goals and 15.

Both put themselves about and scored good goals for their respective clubs yesterday Shanklands was a peach.

Shankland is 28 and Miovski is 24. What would we be paying £4-5m for Miovski £2-3m for Shankland or thereabouts? The difference is irrelevant relative to rewards for automatic champions league qualification but Shankland has no resale value.

I haven’t watched enough of either but both could hit the ground running and would score goals and would bring a degree of physicality Shankland more so.

Either or for me but taking all the above into consideration including negative impact Shankland would have on team photo I’d go for Miovski. He probably fits the profile better.

03 Jan 2024 18:45:07
What if we offer a sweetener - Turnbull + cash for Miovski or M J + cash for Shankland?

03 Jan 2024 19:20:14
Eas thi. king that myself. mj as a bargaining tool.

03 Jan 2024 20:55:04
Shankland all day for me. He's outscored Kyogo since he moved to Hearts and he can actually score a penalty!

04 Jan 2024 07:50:01
Neither! Not good enough and not worth weakening the other clubs in our league. Miovski will be another Cifcti and will be moved on after a year after playing 6 games.

04 Jan 2024 14:27:34
I personally think Shankland has more to his game than Miovski, Shankland can play with his back to goal, he can hold the ball in and lay it off, he links the play well and scores all sorts of goals which I think is good to have, Miovski is more just a striker who runs in behind and takes his opportunities, both would get goals for us but Shankland is the better player all round .



Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass  
Change Consent