Celtic Banter Archive December 21 2012

21 Dec 2012 21:44:36
Was just reading the banter page on the main site. Does anybody else hate the boy maximus?

Pauliy-chuckles {Ed007's Note - Even his wife hates him.}

He's a t1t. but come on, look a wee bit further down . now there is a real cracker . geo the ger . people say care in the community is a good thing but when you read geo the gers nonsense , i'm not so sure .. shammy

Ed , you working as a cleaner now ? . but yeah sorry for my turn of phrase . but that ****** deserves it .. shammy

If the rest of you are wondering why i'm so bemused by geo the ger . this is his post 19 dec 2012 15:31:17
celtic fans have a chip on their shoulder and egg on their face, whereas rangers ' fans, today have blue chips on their shoulder and a broad smile on their face! merry xmas all ... geo the ger.. .. straight jacket or what .. shammy {Ed007's Note - AAwww bless him, I bet his papa was in stitches when he told him that one.}

21 Dec 2012 21:37:55
Could it be that the Sevvies are direct descendants of the Mayans ? there is clear evidence to support this theory ..... Bold ridiculous predictions , living off ancient beliefs and history and extinct and out of touch with modern civilisation !!

21 Dec 2012 15:49:02
thur wance wiz a guy called mcoist
he wiz slimy like a fanny thits moist
he tried tae look hard
bit wae baws made a lard
he wisnae exactly furst choice!
boom boom whit say you edo hows yur nakul?
here dae ye waant me tae take it tae lourdes wae me, ur jist post it secund poast mibee
her if it went missin ye coodnae sue me cos,
ye widnae huv a leg tae staun oan!
am apperin in the posso pavilyin wae wee tommy sheridan this year weans ur barred!

21 Dec 2012 13:20:32
When Fergus McCann saved Celtic, he paid off the bank, creditors and some of the shareholders.

He did not want to take the route of liquidation and clearly stated he was not prepared for there to be no Celtic.

Whilst Fergus went about his business of rebuilding Celtic - having paid the debts, our rivals Rangers continued to overspend, now amid allegations of cheating, in pursuit of bettering Celtic's achievements of the European Cup and 9-in-a-row...neither were bettered & only one equalled.

Cue 18 years later, Celtic are flourishing in a league that compared to the rest of European football has serious financial constraints. We are in the last 16 of the world's most prestigious Club competition with a young (quite) inexperienced manager who has assembled a squad that has the youngest average age in the competition and at a cost of £15m.

Rangers and now in the liquidation process, having paid no-one. A failed Chief Exec of an English League Club bought the assets and is now bragging of being the same Club that Gazza played for, worth £45m and debt free with promises of £30m to spend on players this time next year. To put the tin hat on their crassness they also threw themselves a 140th birthday party (years not days).

If you dare say anything about this, you are obsessed or if you are a club who points out they are a new club...they will use mob mentality & bully boy tactics to demand an apology.

There is no obsession, just anger that I watched as Fergus came in, saved my Club and paid the outstanding debts. Set about building a new Stadium and putting the Club on a stable financial footing. Tell me how on this earth what the 'Club' in Govan has done that is the same as this ?

I've heard the stories of Rangers being around since 1872 and the 'company' 27 years later...well without this company that formed 27 years later, they would have ceased to exist after 27 years. Celtic can revert back if they want to their original name... Rangers cannot, why ? Rangers Football Club can no longer exist or be resurrected in anyway shape of form.

The lack of class and disrespect to creditors and clubs who saved themselves by paying their way is disgraceful and anything built on a foundation like this with fail spectacularly.

Mrs E

Agreed,but let them get on with it,they will be rolling out the "duped" card again through time

Absolutely superb Mrs E. Very eloquently put and could not be closer to the truth.

JGD

Do you realize you have just ended the world for the rangers fans when they thought everything was ok.
great post as usual Mrs E. .H.

Great Post Mrs E, i think you have put eloquently what a majority is thinking!

Red Devil

No argument here Mrs E. I cannot understand how they are not ashamed of their antics...............green jhedi

Hing oan hing oan is this the same auld biddy thit wiz settin aboot me wae a fish supper 2 weeks ago?
ye wurnae so elaquint then mrs e!
here when dae ye waant yur commode back am fkd if am emtyin it?

Mrs e , you said your festive goodbyes yesterday , and yet here you are again . are you related to a certain mr. green . or whyte .. shammy

Spot on Mrs E....pitchforks at the ready at the debtdome.

Good stuff mrs e take a bow

Bman

See if you disagree at least be man/woman to tell me why ???

C'mon tell me why i'm wrong...we welcome the chase ~ Mrs E

21 Dec 2012 12:02:57
edo av jist released ma " noo thats the ****iest cd it xmas ever!"
bit jist wait till ye see some ae the brammers oan it ! songs like;
sally roastin oan an opin fire
durranty pickin it his toes
the fires awfy brite
weer fryin tonight.....
alsae:
"oh the weva ootside is fritefull,
could be worse we could live in Sighthill!
n wee chicos nose is aglow
let it grow let it grow let it grow
then;
hately the blue nose raindeer
baldy heid n big blue nose
dressed up like a wumin
wae a bra n panthose....
& lastly that auld fav:
wee craigo n wee chico
theyr money men aye right!
of all the con men in the world
the both of them are ****e
available in aw good tim shoaps noooooooooooooooo!

21 Dec 2012 13:08:31
ha ha wee Pat brilliant as usual...
What about Fat Sally's favourite song from the Wizard of Oz? Somewhere over the rainbow...
WI' A PIE!! lol Timalloy

That will go with his autobiography out just now. life of a pie. .H.

21 Dec 2012 11:37:27
Rangers International FC Plc posted its the same historic club 140 years old and listed all old historical club's achievements in their brief to the stock exchange.
Can we please start the list of reasons it's not the same club again?
1. Founded in 1872 and incorporated in 1899 to enter association football under incorporated club regulations, it is now in liquidation and recorded as such at companies house.
2. Charles Green's brand new Sevco5088 club was in no league in Scotland had no votes whilst the old club was in the SPL and still had SFA membership vote and SPL membership vote. Green had bought assets at this point but old club still existed in SPL and called Rangers Football Club.
3.old historical Rangers FC voted to allow Green's sevco5088 into the SPL. But all the other clubs voted against.
4. Whilst old Rangers were still in SPL, Green's new club then went to SFL asking to get into div1. The SFL chairmen refused this as a new club and allowed them to enter association football in SFL Div3.
5. Green's new club did not have SFA membership but SFA agreed to give them a membership conditionally. Including paying all the shameful football debts of old historical rangers. If they were the old Rangers they would have automatically have had their SFA membership.
6. The SFL agreed to give the brand new club sevco Rangers a membership, regardless of SFL regulation requiring that new clubs entering SFL need four years approved and certified accounts which Green's club do not have.
7. Circa 40 players, worth about £30m according to McCoist, walked away from historic Rangers club as they did not need to transfer legally to Green's new club. If it was the same club it would have the same players on the same contracts.
8. Lord Nimmo-Smith a high court law lord in Scotland has declared that Green's new club has legally does not and never has played in the SPL top tier of Scottish football. Ergo has never won any trophies or qualified for CL.
9. You cannot sell history nor titles and achievements. It's an intangible. One clubs historic honours cannot be claimed by another club founded in 2012.
10. Green's brand new club failed to honour goodwill relationships with the old club's historical trading partners preferring to start new arrangements. Eg JBSPORTS to Sports Direct.
11. Corporate Goodwill refers to established trading partners and trading connections, it in no way refers to the history and achievements of a football club in liquidation.
12. 100% Previous Scottish football clubs that were liquidated ceased their history. The history could not be transferred this is legal precedent. It just cannot happen.
13. The other clubs in Scotland do not recognise it as the same historic Rangers and rightly so.
14. Green is breaking insolvency laws by using the exact branding, logos, badges, crests, colours and name of old historical Rangers in liquidation. By continuing to break the statutory laws, he hopes he will create an identity as close to historical rangers as possible and be recognised as such. But rightfully tell him to drop the name, branding logos, etc,... As required, and its plain for all to see its a new club. Why are the authorities allowing his charade to continue to ridiculous lengths? Including duping the stock exchange with his claims?
15. Green tells lies often. He is mendacious. His claim that rangers is the same historical club is simply another lie.
16. UEFA, FIFA and the SFA have not accepted Green's club as the historic club because legally under Scottish law it is not the same club. In fact the SFA has treated Green's Rangers as a brand new club in the Scottish footballing system.
17. Green has provided a false legal case to ECA, falsely representing his new club as historic Rangers. ECA need to review this to uphold their own integrity.
18. The legal system in Scotland does not legally recognise Charles Green's new club as the historical Rangers FC founded in 1872. No legal claims or civil proceedings against old club would be valid against the new legal entity. That includes any issues out with corporate business issues. It is quite simply not the same football club legally.
19. Green bought assets, physical things that were the remnants of the old club. Nothing more.
20. The old historical Rangers will have its titles stripped due to illegal registration of players over 11 years in SPL. Greens new club has never played in the SPL.
21. Former players and staff associated with the old Rangers are on record stating its not the same club and this attitude is just in fans minds.
22. If club and company are not linked then why are the directors and board the same for both?
23. If the club and company are not linked why does the club get a ten point penalty for the company poor financial performance?(administration).
24. Green's brand new Rangers is not the old historic Rangers club that was a founding club of ECA. That particular old club is being liquidated.

More to come.

So why do they have a transfer ban then?

They SEVCO huv a transfer ban cause they didnae huv an SFA membership.
SFA said ok we'll gie yeez a membership if yeez pay the auld clubs fitba debts and take oor wee minor token punishment ban fur the auld club's bringing the game into disrepute. Green said naw no chance, then he caved in tae get playing fitbaw.
It in no way, as stated at the time, should confuse eejits, that it implies its the same club.

Clubs owed money from the liquidation forced SFA to get it from greens new club in return for a license to play and punishment as well. It was a condition of the new club to enable it to get a license.

21 Dec 2012 09:30:06
If that world does end at 11.11am today at least we will go down in history as being the best team in the world seeing as we were the last team to beat the best team in the world.
Hopefully I can re post after 11.12am LOL
KevBhoyo

Slightly flawed theory bud. I think the title would have to go to ICT as the team who beat the team who beat the best team in the world??

Foxy

21 Dec 2012 07:19:04
Well maybe im gonna be proved right on the bangura prediction, played for the development squad yesterday and lone behold he scored ( Watch this space )

The Happy Turnkey