Celtic Banter Archive October 21 2015

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

21 Oct 2015 20:39:37
I have to agree to an extent with the original poster. Armstrong hasn't done anything standout for me and hasn't so far impressed me. He isn't a left winger. Yaya Toure is a box to box midfielder and he has none of his traits. Petrov was a box to box midfielder- in my opinion doesn't look anything like petrov. I don't think he is a bad player but isn't compatible in the current system. I would say it's a culture shock mixed with out of position and a garnish of injury that hasn't allowed us to see the real product but as always with Celtic fans - his clock is ticking. Some fans seem to have a lot of faith in potential. Potential isn't right now that's still to come so you can't justify his current form by saying he has great potential. We need people who are actually doing it right now.

Believable1 Unbelievable4

22 Oct 2015 01:11:01
Exactly mate hasn't impressed me either, we can't afford to be spending £1.75M on average squad players and for me that's what Armstrong is. I'd like to know Rayman the attributes you feel that Armstrong possesses which would make him a good box to box midfielder? Because from what I see he has none of those traits which are required for that sort of role.

Agree0 Disagree1

22 Oct 2015 10:04:54
I don't think it's anything to do with potential with Armstrong, it's the fact he's only been at the club about 8 months. I think he has played well in games, - he hit the ground running, along with GMS, both were the best players on the pitch against Inter, it's GMS that's done nothing this season. Of course they both have to kick on now, they're not kids, but are just in the door. It's guys like Forrest that kill me, especially when people talk about his potential, - he's been in the team 5 years, not 8 months! What I like about Armstrong is I think he is a modern midfielder, - he's over 6' good energy, technically good, and can get a goal. I prefer him more centrally, and if he can add a little bit more dig I think he could play beside Biton for example in the 2 man midfield when playing a 4231. I mean a few years down the line. He's also got a great temperament, and seems like a good guy, he's one of the recent signings I'm actually happy about! He's obviously never a winger though and that's why he plays left of the 3, - so he can cut on to his right foot. Even in the long term if Johansen and Biton stay you could play both of them as the 2 holding midfielders, 1 is right footed/1 left, Johansen plays there for Norway also, and play Armstrong behind the striker. I think at the moment with Brown and Biton playing Ronny is trying to fit in Johansen/Commons/Armstrong to the 3 in front of them, and they are all better central. And before people start freaking out about the system - these players are even less suited to a 442 because that would mean 2 playing even more on the touch line. And a 433 is just a slight variation off a 4231 because you still have the 1 striker, 2 wide players who are playing a bit more narrow. I think if we had another couple of top strikers it would make a huge difference, and give us options in different games.

Agree1 Disagree1

22 Oct 2015 12:22:10
I just read the other posts below JimTim, I don't want you thinking I'm blagging your ideas about Armstrong and Forrest - great minds and all that. Like yourself probably I just find Forrest so frustrating because everyone has been raving about him since He made his debut (and actually scored) especially Lennon, - he's in his mid 20's now, I think he is very predictable, he knocks it past the full back and beats him for pace on the outside. He is super quick, has good balance, but I think he is average technically and doesn't really have a football brain, unlike Armstrong. He doesn't score enough either or play with the head up, so his final ball/crosses are pot luck. He's out of contract in a few months, along with Mulgrew, I wouldn't be that bothered if we just let them both go. For me Mulgrew is goodish in a few positions but not really good in any, and if you gave Forrest a new 3/4 year deal we don't know if he'll actually ever fulfill this supposed potential, or stay fit. The little bits of Nesbitt I've seen have impressed me, he's another that is a no 10, and looks very technical, he reminds me of a young Joe Cole type, he's very slight though, if he can get a bit stronger, keep the head he might be a better option going forward. Talking of players being slight, I hope the young players at Lennoxtown aren't being treated like Oliver Twist and are scared to ask for second helpings for lunch, surely Peter Lawwell hasn't gone that far, it's just all the 18/19/20 year olds we bring through are needing to fill out O'Connell/Henderson/Tierney/Nesbitt and even the other 2 lads I've seen a bit of - Donnelly and Thompson. DH will like this, - as he knows I was looking for rugby league esque players!

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2015 14:53:37
Not posted in a while but is it me or does anyone else agree that Stuart Armstrong is a bang average limited football player? That's the exact way I felt about him before he arrived from Dundee Utd and I'm still yet to be convinced he's anything other than that. He may be the best out of the three Dundee Utd lads, some may perhaps debate that, but that's not exactly saying much. Personally I think Dundee Utd have robbed us with £1.75M for Armstrong. The reason I'm bringing this up is because I was hoping Forrest would make it tomorrow night but John Collins just said he's still injured so most likely Armstrong will get the nod out there against Molde in his absence.

I fail to see what he brings down that left hand side for a start and with Forrest out injured, Stokes not in Ronny's plans and with everything that has happened with Boeriggter I think Armstrong has landed on his feet to be playing that left wing role frequently, it's a square peg in a round hole from Ronny tbh. From what I've seen his touch and passing has let him down out there a lot, he has very little pace and can't beat his man with any skill, rarely wins us fouls and his set piece delivery from corners is not great either and his final ball which he tries with his weaker foot a lot is really infuriating and rarely finds anyone, I remember in the last few mins against Fenerbache Rogic played a nice ball out wide to him, Armstrong gathered it and there was Blackett on the edge of the box with his arms out wide waiting for it, all Armstrong had to do was look up and cut it back to him, instead he played a poor aimless ball with his weaker foot into the box which Fenerbache dealt with easily, that's a severe lack of football intelligence and awareness.

Shouldn't be played out there imo and I also don't buy this he should be played centrally behind the striker, he isn't a big enough goal threat for me, you need to be capable of scoring at least 10-15 goals a season behind that striker role in the team and for me Armstrong has not got that in his locker, the only position I could see him in perhaps is in the two holding roles Brown and Bitton currently occupy, but with it looking very unlikely he could break that partnership up he should be nothing more than a squad player for me from the bench, never a starter.

He's nowhere near as effective a winger as Forrest who has done well out there this season taking on defenders and winning fouls, just his final ball still fails him at times, but still a much better player than Armstrong out wide. It could also be argued that even Stokes and Boeriggter would be much more effective options out there and I'm by no means a fan of both those players, far from it but even I think they'd do a better job than Armstrong out there. I didn't think we could do worse than Stokes out wide but in Armstrong I think we have and you only have to look at what Boeriggter done on the left wing with Ajax and his other clubs in Holland to see his assists and goals he was getting when giving a run out there. There's obviously something going on there with Boeriggter as he's fit and training with the development squad, he wasn't in the first team photo, not in the say no to racism video and hasn't been training with the first team in so long.

Believable1 Unbelievable7

21 Oct 2015 15:24:39
Can I take it u don't think too highly of Armstrong .

Agree1 Disagree0

21 Oct 2015 15:35:42
Sorry mate totally disagree. I think he gets played out of position and is not first pick.

Agree1 Disagree0

21 Oct 2015 15:47:00
You have your opinion mate but that's a poor post esp about a player just back from injury.
Its clear to me Armstrong is a box to box midfielder the problem is we don't play that way.
We are far too rigid in our system and its obvious we just don't have the payers to play it.
We have 2 sitting 2 out wide and a number 10 so to speak. No room for a box to box player. Most teams cry out for a player like this.
What do we do with him? Shove him out wide where its obvious he is not comfortable there.
How can you get the best out of a player if you u don't play him in his best position.
I have seen this so many times a good player gets shoved into a position and all you get is someone doing a job there instead of getting the best out of them.
I sure we can all name players this has happened too, god I even remember Danny McGrain (prob the best right back in the world at the time) getting shoved to left back for Scotland to accommodate Sandy Jardine.

Agree1 Disagree0

21 Oct 2015 16:07:06
But lads from what I see Armstrong hasn't even shown signs he can be a great player at all, it's not just the position he plays. He's got a poor first touch at times, passing is erratic, poor from set pieces and has no final ball. No pace or skill also and nowhere near clinical enough. He's admitted he's now back and fully fit, so I don't buy this just back from injury excuse, he said himself he feels good. He had a chance against Motherwell where he cut inside just outside the box, with some space around him to take a shot and completely miscued it and put is wide. I just don't see this box to box guy either, he doesn't have the fitness or energy for such a role imo, he always seems to be blowing out his backside whenever the pace picks up a bit in Europe, can't seem to handle it. This is just what I'm seeing, don't think anyone can suggest that he's an above average player.

Agree0 Disagree6

21 Oct 2015 16:14:30
Celticforever if the point of your post was to get us all talking then you succeeded, but I like Armstrong, even more than GMS, and I think he links up play well especially if Commons is playing, he does a lot of Commons running for him, no he is worth a starting berth, even if Forrest was fit as he always flatters to deceive.
I really hope Lustig, Simonovic, Boyata and Izzy are our back four, Brown and Biton, Armstong, Johansen, Commons and Griffiths making up our starting 11.

Agree3 Disagree0

21 Oct 2015 18:32:46
I like Armstrong, I think he is potentially the best of all the attacking midfielders we have, I think he is better centrally though, either behind the striker, or even long term playing in the 2 man midfield behind the 3. He has a little bit of everything. I also think that will be Hendersons best position. Even playing a 433 long term with Biton/Armstrong/Henderson, there would be good energy about that midfield!

Agree2 Disagree0

21 Oct 2015 18:47:10
Please let it be a long while before you post again!

Agree3 Disagree0

21 Oct 2015 19:54:27
Gonna be honest here, I stopped reading after the first paragraph but taking the stuff you say about Armstrong into consideration, I think I will be placing an anytime goal scorer bet on him tomorrow now.

Agree1 Disagree0

22 Oct 2015 09:59:57
Celticforever, just have a wee look at the stats for Armstrong's assists compared to Forrest, then look at the time they've both been at the club.

Agree1 Disagree0

22 Oct 2015 13:36:35
I've liked both Armstrong and Forrest in several of our European ties this term. Armstrong when he gets by the first man and muscles to the by-line, and forrest when he comes inside (although his wide running will be missed tonite I reckon; was sorry to see he won't make the game and - surpassingly disappointed.

Anyway: good vibrations about the game this evening. let's go get the points!

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2015 06:05:15
{Ed's Note - We have posted a new article entitled, Premier League Disappointments

Believable0 Unbelievable1

21 Oct 2015 14:43:41
Special mention Ed! I've been getting some stick off my pals down here, as has Scottish football due to my appraisal of Virgil. To be fair I said his one on one defending needed some work and that he was a luxury. A luxury I wasn't sure Southampton could afford.

Agree0 Disagree0

21 Oct 2015 17:20:58
Celticforever, you are bang on target, both Armstrong and GMS have been a waste of money, we were robbed, they had hype in Feb, March, but neither have performed since. Armstrong is too weak for SPL rough and tumble, he does not have enough talent to skip out of the hard challage, and GMS is just ok against the bottom 3/4 clubs, he cannot hack it against the bigger clubs.

Agree1 Disagree3

22 Oct 2015 09:09:11
Ed, just went to PL Disappointments and first thing to show was the breast augmentation ad. Now I know there are some right t*ts play in the PL but that's a bit drastic lol!
I also notice someone clicked disagree WTF is that about? You state a new site, add a link and some neanderthal disagrees. ach well, I suppose it keeps them off the streets.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - the ad is for those of you looking to net yourself a Prem footballer of your own. Ed007 has already had his own enhanced in readiness.}

 
Change Consent