26 Aug 2015 11:21:24
Hi ed have been thinking this for a while now but not totaly sure and was wondering if you had a better insight

Everytime we qualify for champions lge or make huge money on selling players or both at same time. the nxt thing the club release figures saying we only made lyk 10 m profit

I remember us maling 50m the season we beat barca and in summer sold ki wanyamm wilso and hooper 5m was spent but wer the rest go??

6months later the club release new figers for the 6 months after that saying profits are down because we didn't reach cham lge but the facts wer we still made all the money that were not use to getting

I think board members and investers are creaming this club dry.

Do you no if all the investors who bought shares all those years ago are now reaping yearly rewards totaling to millions????

Hope you have the time to read this

Cheers

{Ed007's Note - If you have preference shares (guys like Dermot and Pedro) you get an annual dividend, the holders of ordinary shares - blokes like you and me - don't get paid anything.}

1.) 26 Aug 2015
26 Aug 2015 15:35:20
Funny that

2.) 26 Aug 2015
26 Aug 2015 17:53:02
Rangers had in a 3 year period done to us what you are having done over 50 years as far as I can see.

Do you remember the attendance figures in 60s? I was not blind I could see 55000 plus fans yet attendance figures thousands bellow that every game unless it was a total sell out which kind of scr*wed the bead counters

I have also noticed what one of your posters on here states that you were making millions from CL PLUS selling players on a huge profits such as Ki Wanyama Foster etc yet you profit numbers never seemed to show this.

I feel it is blatantly obvious the same scam being perpetrated as Green and his pals carried out at Rangers the difference at Ibrox was it was over such a short term and so blatant that no number cruncher on this planet could hide it from even your least sharp tack football fan.

I am not on here to gloat I am on here to point out something you lot seemed to gloss over when slagging your fellow Scots off as being unilaterally stupid/blind/thick by following these shysters like lambs to the slaughter unquestioning and naive to the core. What you fail to acknowledge and I feel has been your blindest sad judgment on us as fanatics for our football team, Rangers, is to forget that as in all matters of love it can be blind.Just because all the implications are that we are being shafted that hope and love led Bears to yes appear stupid and naive but it is not a fault loving, the fault is with the people carrying out the deception surely?

That is why I am on here now to say you lot need to get the boycott out now before Rangers come back to the SPFL. It is a far easier thing to boycott your team when he league is either 1. Relatively easy to win 2. Does not matter as much as in the lower leagues. Rangers would never have succeeded in a boycott had the SPFL title been at stake against Celtic.

I agree with your poster on here the best thing to happen for you would be Hearts winning the League (I would enjoy that for other reasons) and you get rid of current regime with the man that is attempting to manage you, he is average at best ANYONE and I actually include the worst Rangers manager in history McCoist could have won the league the last 3 years with zero credible opposition, with the possible exception of the Sheep last year.

It is a sign of how bad things are with your team that right now if questioned 99% of Rangers fans would say they would rather be us than you now. We have a semi organised support at last, the songs are starting to change to traditional positive ones and newer non bigoted songs, the board despite many doubts over King's suitability has done the correct thing invested in a talented management team having interviewed the best 5 candidates available, provided funding for clever signings from the English and Scottish leagues at sensible wages and most importantly put Rangers and the fans first not their own financial wellbeing. The current board are not receiving large wage packets and are not creaming bonuses off the top. Your board are it is the only explanation. They are also completely correct in not paying Ashley he is involved from the outset with Green and therefore potentially subject to Police investigation, who in there right mind would accept the terms of the Green/Ashley stitch up merchandise wise?

There you have it maybe now you might reflect and think you are actually following blindly yourselves and have been on the basis of trusting the board have your teams' interests at heart. Do they?

Ask yourselves this when they scoured the marketplace for a manager would you say Delilah was the best option or the cheapest option?