Celtic Banter Archive March 07 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

07 Mar 2014 22:20:29
her ed betwean me and you howd ye get oan wae the fanny lip transplant
mer importante hows wee timbo wae his new kissers?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

08 Mar 2014 11:57:34
hey wee man good to hear from you again (Mrs E in particular has missed your repartee) lol

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Mar 2014 22:03:43
her you whit dae ye caw a hoarse wae a fanny hauf the waey up its back???
pc 666

Believable0 Unbelievable0

07 Mar 2014 21:21:50
Question for all the board haters on here who moan about the lack of investment in quality players . Just say Celtic went out and spent £50 million to strengthen the team, where do you think this would put us in terms of success at home and abroad? My thoughts are it would guarantee us the SPL which is guaranteed anyway, probably pretty much guarantee us the treble, guarantee CL qualification? maybe, but we've done this anyway for the last couple of seasons, guarantee us last 16? definately not. What I'm trying to say is in this day and age of the cash laden leagues £50 million is loose change and guarantees nothing. Another point that gets mentioned a lot is ticket pricing which I agree is way overpriced, but this is a problem in the whole of Scottish football, I believe it's near £20 to get into a Falkirk game, so going by that Celtic at £28 is probably about right. The cost to watch Scottish football needs to be addressed urgently. ....Stevie

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I don't hate the Board or anything like that at all. I actually find the 'relationship' some have with the Board weird lol

It's a means to an end, they manage the cashflow. It's not perfect but its not horrendous either. We shouldn't need to spend millions to win domestically but we want to at least compete a bit in Europe. Celtic rake in a lot more than other Scottish Clubs and a helluva lot comes from the fans - merchandise and matchday revenue. We just want a wee something back and not the lacklustre performances of this season.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Mar 2014 23:20:33
Mrs E I think in financial terms we are a group stage CL team, which is what we are. In size of club I believe we are a top 8 European Club. Unfortunately in todays football world there are many clubs nowhere near as big as Celtic that can finance world class players

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - I'd say we should be aiming to be a Last 16 of the CL team or the 3rd place team who drops down to the EL, Stevie. Anything less should be seen as a failure IMO. All the talk about being grateful just to be in the CL does my nut in, we're there because we have earned the right to be there, why haven't we earned the right to take it to the next level to be seen as a good CL team and not some minnows that are there to make up the numbers.
I've said it before and I still maintain that CFC and some of our supporters have adopted, and accepted, a small club mentality. You rarely see managers, players or board members of other clubs say that it's a great achievement just to qualify apart from Rangers, it was just another myth peddled by the media to cover up for their failings in Europe.}

Stevie your spot on wether it be 50 40 or 30mil? Even still the treble could be shaky as one off games can be a killer so no guarantee!
I'm not a board hater, but I am of the guys that don't think their doing enough, off the field? Can't ask for any more really!? On it? They haven't backed the manager!
Being a realist I can understand where that are at, crap league and set up, no competition and guaranteed CL qualifiers, beyond that? Slowly diminishing.
Unfortunately if we keep going the way we are, we will struggle to get past that stage!
The board have made it clear that is what's needed, so why hamper it?
Given what we have made, the outgoings are abismal, the boards lies are being taken in and unless it changes in the nxt 4/5 yrs there won't be CL football!
We have been selling to spend, and being replaced with mince.
Poss 6/10mil out with our selling income shouldn't be out of the question every3/4 seasons? Especially what we would make actually qualifying for CL and not risking it!?
Lawwell stated the money made and retained through sales and CL football would make celtic sustainable for the nxt 3/4 years! Well I'm sorry, but if they guys can't make them sustainable without money that isn't and shouldn't be guaranteed then they aren't doing their job, you can't account for money that isn't there!

Bigbadjohn

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Mar 2014 23:58:37
Ed I think sadly the reality is that football today is ruled by cash and we are a small club on those terms . You can guarantee that this seasons last 8 in CL will consist of clubs from the 4 TV funded rich leagues. Not impossible though to break into the fat cats league, Porto, Rosenbourg and I think it was Czech side last season that done it

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Olympiacos this year could be in the Last 8 and as I posted the other week we are well above their level financially. If we were due to go to Old Trafford with a 2-0 lead wouldn't you be gutted if we lost or would you still feel that at least we were 'allowed' to get as far? It isn't just all about money to have a well organised, hard to beat team.}

08 Mar 2014 00:38:03
Forgot about them hope they get through although I know you won't lol. The only clubs globally that are bigger than us imo are Real, Barca, Milan, Juve, Man U, Liverpool, Bayern, possibly Inter and Dortmund, I know Asia has jumped on the Chelsea bandwagon but that doesn't count imo, I'm talking about deep rooted support. What's your thoughts ed on biggest clubs globally

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - I think you're about right there but if you are going to discount Chelsea you need to discount Liverpool. Both Chelsea and Arsenal have more world-wide support than Liverpool and they all have millions of Asian fans and it is estimated that Chelsea have around 140 million fans around the world, Arsenal an estimated 115 million and Liverpool have only around 70 million. Liverpool aren't as well supported now as they were in the past, remember a lot of their success came before the TV saturation so they haven't picked up as much younger fans around the world than more successful teams.
Barca with an estimated 260 million fans are a perfect example of how a bit of success can boost the figures, it's only over the last few years that they have had any notable period of success compared to teams like Man Utd, Liverpool, Real Madrid, Munich, the Milan clubs and Juve who have all had overall success over sustained periods over the years time. Then there are clubs like Urawa Red Diamonds from Japan and Boca Juniors from Argentina who we tend to overlook because we don't get brainwashed by TV about them.}

Stevie which honest football fan, of any club, doesn't want to see their club spend as much as they can afford on the team.

Agree0 Disagree0

Got to agree on your outlook on Liverpool.I live in epl brainwashed Ireland and take my word for it the Liverpool support here are in cloud cuckoo land. They are convinced they are a box office club and they believe only united and madrid hold more global stature than them.
Gally

Agree0 Disagree0

Gally, that is what happens when you are 5 time European Champions, there are very few clubs bigger than us, barring the two you mention and perhaps Barca and AC Milan.
Ed007, them stats make me laugh, all 3 clubs you mention toured Asia last year, with us selling out every stadium, and Chelsea and Arsenal playing in half empty stadiums. Stats such as them cannot be used to judge club size, as they reflect very little. For example, United will score very highly, but if they have another season like this, they will struggle to sell out Old Trafford on a match day.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - The figures are estimates that people use Smithy, just because you're team aren't showing too well don't take it out on me. We all know you Scousers are a touchy bunch when faced with the truth.}

Smithy I'm glad it was you! I'm not the same kind of fan you are of Liverpool but I do feel strongly about the Club. Regardless of how big their fanbase is, debt is etc etc - it changes nothing.

Considering they haven't been successful and need a new stadium, Liverpool do alright.

Would be good to see some of the other Clubs give it a go - Chelsea with no CL football for a few seasons and floating about mid league ppfft?

Agree0 Disagree0

I was merely pointing out that such stats are utterly pointless Ed, I wasn't, taking anything out on anybody. Simply put, I think everybody should support their local team, so our worldwide fan base is of little interest. Care to elaborate on us not liking to face the truth? Sounds like a bad manc shout that, thought you were better than snide little digs like that.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Without your worldwide fan-base you would be in an even worse financial position though. You're bang out of order with your second point, you know I never meant anything like that, get a grip and stop and being so touchy. I have a pop at Liverpool fans flying off the handle when faced with facts about their current position and you accuse me of that, I thought you were better than that?
Would you care to elaborate on why that could be seen as a Manc dig if you want to drag it down to that level, I don't think you want to go down that road, do you?}
That says says a hell of a lot more about you than me.}

Yes Mrs.E when you think that the club nearly went bust a few years back we have done incredibly well, and have a very good young squad, with, hopefully, champions league football to come next season. It is starting to become a really exciting time to be a Liverpool fan again.
Ed007, I've always got on we'll with you on here, and apologise if you meant nothing more to it. However it read terribly, and we all know the connotations regarding 'the truth' and Liverpool Football Club. The fact your phrase was plural suggested to me it couldn't have just been me not seeing what such stats indicate, and since the only time I've ever seen any indication of Liverpool fans not accepting the truth is by mancs and Chelsea fans regarding Hillsborough/Heysel I questioned you further. I expected it would be down to a poorly chosen turn of phrase, however if I think there is the slightest chance of somebody using people dying as a way of point scoring I will question it. Again, if this was not the case I apologise. Not sure what that says about me though.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Perhaps you're just the type that is always looking for something to be offended at. You know talk like that isn't welcome on any of the sites.}

Ed what is the estimated amount of tic fans worldwide?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - It's estimated at between 9 and 10 million Barry.}

Smithy, maybe it's me and Clubs 'nearly' going bust lol

I usually rise to these things but I'm trying to be good :-)

Liverpool are still huge and if you had a poll to say which English Clubs could hold their own without the broadcasting cash the EPL attracts, the smart votes would be on Liverpool being near the top.

I know at lot of folk that support teams that are much smaller than Celtic, Liverpool and Man Utd, there is no way I can get away with coming out with big time chat. Very easy to support a team that wins all the time and gets a trophy every other season. Try traipsing up and down the Country just for the love of the Club and the game.

Agree0 Disagree0

Cheers Ed, that just shows you how much power money has in football, I would never of thought Chelsea, a team that sold it's soul for money would have so many fans, what's that 14, 15 times more than us, that's unbelievable, I dare to think how great our worldwide support would be if we played in the epl.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - What club hasn't sold it's soul Barry? Football is now all about getting you to part with as much money as possible.}

Very true ED, but most haven't stooped so low, changing a teams badge and colours to suit the new owner is just ridiculous. we would never allow that to happen to Celtic.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - That whole Cardiff situation will not end well Barry, the thing with Hull/Hull Tigers will probably be the same.}

07 Mar 2014 10:15:55
So Dermot Desmond has claimed that Celtic's "balance-sheet performance and the performance on the field exceeds any other club" in the UK and also stated "I see the club getting stronger on the playing field. I see the club being visionary in developing internationally."

I take it he didn't watch the League Cup embarrassment against Morton? Or how far off the pace we were in Europe from the 2nd leg of the Elfsborg qualifier? I take it he didn't watch us whimper out the Scottish Cup to Aberdeen either? I take it he isn't aware we sold our best players (Wanyama, Ledley + Hooper) in the past 6 months? The only thing that has improved this season is the bank balance - through player sales + lack of reinvestment, the standard of football and quality on the pitch has went back 3-4 years!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I also assume that he isn't aware that ourselves and Wigan were the only UK based group stage team (EL + CL) who didn't progress - Arsenal, Chelsea, Man City, Man Utd, Spurs and Swansea were all still in Europe after Christmas?

Agree0 Disagree0

“If you look at the squads over the past few years, they are getting better and better each year.” Wrong.

Agree0 Disagree0

Spot on HB and JimTim. I wonder where are all the PLC apologists are today? Let's hear the evidence to back up what Dermot Desmond has said because I can't see it.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Mar 2014 13:26:22
Sorry guys but Celtic have been poor in europe the past 5 years, you have let our coefficient fall away sharply, it will not be until my team glasgow Rangers are back in europe that Scotland's coefficient will rise again.
Going to game on sunday along with 50,000 other bears to see us take next step to our treble.
on other matters once Mr King (a man of impeccable character unlike those other chancers) my club will be once again signing major stars and winning trophies in scotland and reaching latter stages of european tournaments. Wee Bud of Clarkston

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - I don't mind you fishing pal but can you make sure you stay logged in when you do it.}

I'll take #4 guys

. poor in Europe over the last 5 years.
We've won 13 of our last 25 European ties, let's have a wee look at how that compares to other British teams
Chelsea (13/25)
Man Utd (12/25)
Man City (10/25)
the artists formerly known as Rangers (1/25)!
That's less than St Johnstone, Aberdeen, Dunfermline, Motherwell, Hearts - probably every other team in Europe but I can't be botehred to check them all.

I expect you to win your wee treble, after all you've been given a bye to the semi's of the scottish cup and getting to play your semi at home so anything less than winning the trophy would be embarrassing, I've no doubt you'll beat Pollok Juniors or whoever it is yous are playing in the final of the LDV vans cup (or whatever its called) and, fair play, you seem to have whatever league you are in sewn up. well done.

Mr King, the man of morals - not sure who that dig is aimed at charles green? craig whyte? ally mccoist? I'm sure in your head it made sense.

Agree0 Disagree0

@4 Why are you trolling this page with some garbage that has nothing to do with the original post?

In the last 5 years we have reached: CL Group Stage, CL Last 16, EL Group Stage, 2010-11 we were knocked out both CL + EL qualifiying rounds, EL Group Stage.

How did the Deady Bears do in their final 5 years in Europe? let's see: Knocked out CL + EL qualifiying rounds, EL Last 16, CL Group Stage, CL qualifiying rounds, UEFA Cup final.

I'd say Celtic are the superior of the two, considering we're still Glasgow's premier club and your dirty cheating mob are dead!

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Mar 2014 15:06:17
Ha ha wee fuds back looking for looking for someone to bite, anyway some of the things DD said I totally agree with especially when he said Celtic are the best performing club in Britain on and off the pitch, the reason I agree with this is that Celtic can really only be judged by performances in Europe against top opposition, take Man City e.g last season dumped out in group stages of CL, this season last 16 and probably going out, identical to our own record.Where we win the contest of best performing club on and off the pitch is our squad didn't cost 300 million to assemble and our wage bill isn't £639,000 a day

Agree0 Disagree0

Well said Stevie, Celtic are in a strong position and yes this season on a whole has been disappointing but I believe the signing of Griffiths to be a good one and in the summer we will strengthen once more. Mr Desmond, I would rather have him on board than not. Hail Hail

Agree0 Disagree0

@TamTimTic You say you'd rather have Desmond on board than not, why is that? What does he bring to the club? Because as far as I'm aware he's only the majority shareholder - who takes next to nothing to do with the day to day running of things?!

Agree0 Disagree0

@4. Clearly at wind ups.

Agree0 Disagree0

I was disappointed with Dermot’s statement. Granted financially Celtic are in great shape, I don’t think many can argue there.

However this has come from being in the Champions League and the sale of Wanyama and Hooper. How are Celtic going to keep this up if we keep selling our best players and not replacing them?

To say ‘the squads are getting better over the years’, better at what? Sure, I’ve often thought i’m glad Sutton and Larsson left – we have definitely replaced them with better!

No football this weekend, a total scunner.

The current board do have a few positives but this season they seem really out of touch for whatever reason.

Agree0 Disagree0

What a load of bol@@@ks from the spin doctors at Parkhead . It was like a party political broadcast on behalf of the Lawell party . Not a word has been uttered from anybody at Parkhead about our defeat in the cup . The week after it was all about unbeaten records . When that went it was all about 20 years since Fergus came aboard . Now this . No questions to Desmond about GB or living wages paid to employees or why half the ground is empty on match days because of OTT pricing on tickets and catering . Maybe Desmond should turn up on a Saturday when we are playing ICT or on a Tuesday night when we entertain Kilmarnock to see if he still gets goosebumps instead of just rolling up when we play a final or a big CL game . DH

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Mar 2014 19:28:25
Mrs E yes no football I hope Lennon and the team make sure we do not have free weekends like this again, I would rather have a full schedule of games than this empty one.
On Mr Desmond what I do agree with him with is Celtic are run very well financially, you only have to look at Liverpool (£50m debts) even with vast Sky tv revenues.
Also regarding the playing side of things I am looking forward to seeing the likes of Van Dijk, Biton, Johansen, Boerighter, Pukki, Balde, and Fridjonsen play in Europe once they have all had a full pre season training, I think these players will bring a more continental style of play which should help us in Europe.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Liverpool's net debt totals £114 million Tim, the £50 million (£49.8 million) is their losses for the year, they have been losing circa £1 million a week since the new owners took over and even CL football next season AND selling Suarez won't make much of a difference to their finances. They have had to take significant internal interest free loans from other members of the FSG group, and although they are interest free they still require repayment. Poor investments in players hasn't helped.
Liverpool (and Man City) are the only teams in the EPL who have failed to meet the FFPR in all three data collection years so far although Man City, unlike Liverpool, have been strongly moving in the right direction whereas Liverpool are very, very slowly creeping towards compliance.
As it is Liverpool are not even worth the money the owners have so far invested and they will look to sponsorship and partners for additional income.}

Selling our best players? Wilson v Virgil a no brainer. victor v biton, biton already lookin a talent and technically better and vic not exactly lightin up the premiership. Johansson v ledley much the same granted ledley has the experience.And while a fan o hooper, and wasn't over the moon about grifiths if you were to give me free £10 bet on who will score more goals overall and per game I would bet Griffiths.Our best players are also commons forster izzy and bown.They are far more influential in the team than the 1s we sold.Whats your thoughts?

Agree0 Disagree0

Tim, I always try to compare Celtic to other Clubs outwith Scotland but its difficult. EPL have a new broadcasting deal this season, cash we will never see. Liverpool are expected to bring in about £92-95 million this season, that's a different world altogether for me.

I don't know how Celtic would be run if we were in the EPL, they all seem to have debts that would feed a third world country. I know we want our wage structure upped but 300k a week?

Rayman - in my humble opinion anyway:

I like VVD but everytime there's a test I have that wee bit of doubt. I wasn't a huge fan of kelvin Wilson but he was superb for us last season in the Champions League.

Biton, he keeps it simple and I'm liking what I see but again not tested. Next season will be his. Same with Stefan.

Griffiths - too early.

Pukki and Balde - Manager doesn't trust them.

Agree0 Disagree0

Mrs E fair comment but I can only go on where we are just now.Re VVD can you name me worldwide a centre half who is good at defending, got blisterin pace, can ping a ball 50 yrds, good at free kicks, good in the air and score goals? Neither can I. I compare him to Kompany they both very difficult to get past.Granted Kompany got all the experience, but he not got efe to cover either lol and has world class players in front of him.I dnt think Kompany was this good at 22 and when was the last time you saw Kompany ping a ball 50 yrds or score a goal.

Agree0 Disagree0

I don't look for too much in a defender Rayman. I know the game's changed over the years but sometimes there's a lot to be said for just getting the ball away, intercepting and anticipating a pass early on and man marking. Granted some forward players have a pace that's difficult to keep up with particularly for a stocky defender.

I would pay right good money for a decent defender especially as Celtic are considered the underdogs in Europe.

Celtic board If we could get Hummels from Dortmund that would be great, thanks in advance.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent