Celtic Banter Archive July 30 2015

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

30 Jul 2015 21:32:44
What is it about Legia Warsaw and european games, their game tonight was abandoned with them leading 2-1, heard there was crowd trouble

Believable0 Unbelievable0

30 Jul 2015 22:18:32
Hopefully they get booted out again!

Agree0 Disagree0

31 Jul 2015 00:48:20
Yeah their player was on the receiving end of a stone which had been thrown from the crowd. Maybe the should get a reprieve this time.

It will be interesting to see how they go this year just to see how good they are.

Agree0 Disagree0

31 Jul 2015 00:58:51
Some fan from legia hit an opposing player with a stone

Agree0 Disagree1

31 Jul 2015 02:02:16
No Marco the Legia player Duda was the player hit with a stone.

Agree1 Disagree0

31 Jul 2015 08:36:16
Ok my bad sorry

Agree0 Disagree1

31 Jul 2015 08:44:55
They'll obviously knock back any 3-0 win they're offered and just play the rest of the game starting with the same scoreline because of their unwavering integrity and letting football win etc.

Agree1 Disagree0

31 Jul 2015 13:23:59
Give Legia a break. If it happened to us we'd have been devastated and extremely angry.

We move on

Agree1 Disagree0

31 Jul 2015 14:20:26
I agree with you paradisewon we would be still talking about it now if that happened to us I don't hold it against them for trying to qualify it was just a stupid mistake

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 20:40:51
Match on next Wednesday on BT Sports 5:15 pm

Believable0 Unbelievable0

30 Jul 2015 19:33:37
ED007 just wanted to congratulate you for your successful lobbying of Mr Lawwell to give Craig Gordon a new four year deal, you always know a quality player, have you opened the champagne yet to celebrate? lol

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed007's Note - Well he'll at least make a decent No.2 to Bailly.}

30 Jul 2015 21:24:41
Fasan did well last week , we might have three good goalkeepers

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Well 3rd choice then :=o

30 Jul 2015 21:47:27
Was it not a 3 year deal? Not trying to be a smart arse

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 22:37:44
Has Bailly been brought in to be eventual number 1 or just number 2?

Agree1 Disagree1

{Ed007's Note - He was brought in to fight for the No.1 spot.}

30 Jul 2015 11:10:14
Hi Ed,

Any word if the second leg will be on TV.

Rumours that there was only 43k at the match last night, def felt a lot more from my seat.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed007's Note - Nothing has been announced yet.}

30 Jul 2015 15:05:41
Think it will be on BT sport again

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 20:31:39
Announced game on BT sport

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - (yes)

30 Jul 2015 21:25:36
BT Sport Kick off 5.30

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 21:30:06
The game is on bt europe which is the one you have to pay extra for.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 23:44:08
From where I was sitting there didn't seem to be 17,000 seats empty there was definetly more than 43,000 at last nights match.

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 02:51:34
ED, any chance of a poll along the lines of

Are CFC investing sufficiently to merit Champions League Group football. or paying sufficient wages to attract the necessary quality to get us there?

Some brilliant points re last nights game; we are too rigid. We are predictable. Our players play to a "system" and have virtually no license (or appetite), to do anything that would be considered "maverick". This makes us very easy to read. Scott Brown IS NOT CREATIVE and we did nothing to thwart our opponent's set-up which was designed to give Scott Brown the ball. He'll be thinking that they're a poor side; wrong .

.they were smart to give celtic the middle of the park with lots of bodies 30 yards out from their goal with SJ stifled.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

{Ed007's Note - Our polls are down while Ed033 reprograms the sites mate.}

30 Jul 2015 14:20:30
Obviously everyone would like to see us splashing a lot more cash in the market but that doesn't guarantee success. If we qualify then the answer will be yes, if not the answer will be no. There's no real way of judging whether we're investing enough until we're either there or not. So far we've won 3 games out of 3 with 7 scored and only 1 conceded, so you could argue that so far the investment has been more than enough.

Agree0 Disagree1

30 Jul 2015 14:46:51
Ed, you're more screwed on with the dealings than anybody, but everybody feel free to help me out. Total packages of transfer fees and wages of players in to players out this window, have we actually 'spent' anything? On face values and guesstimates i'd say we've actually trimmed costs.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - We've spent £3 million, £1.5m each on Boyata & Ciftci and the undisclosed fee for Bailly which is rumoured to be £300k + add ons. We've brought in £2 million for Adam Matthews and £1m for Pukki (£500k loan fee for last season + £500k transfer fee) so we'e spent £300k, or whatever Bailly cost, on transfer fees so far.
We've certainly cut costs with regard to wages and I still expect a couple of high earners in Scepovic and possibly Stokes to be moved on before the end of the window.}

30 Jul 2015 15:20:20
The bottom line is that u get what u pay for! We'll continue to struggle to get in the CL unless a better calibre of player is brought in! The standards have dropped season after season! And next week will be a real struggle I think! That's before we even find out who we get if we get in the play off round! We are really lacking sum creativity in the middle of the park and our build up play is far to slow and to easy to defend against! It was exactly the same last year! Half decent teams who can actually defend find it easy against us! The only game that we actually looked dangerous in was inter Milan at home,we played with pace and power that night and if it wasn't for sum poor defending would have beat them! Just find or play to be uninspiring to be honest! Doesn't give u much to shout about at the game! Remenber the days when we flew out the traps in European games and gave as good as we got! Seems like a long time ago!

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 15:50:24
Cheers ed. So we will certainly have trimmed 300k by the time you take of Guidetti, Tonev, Wakaso, Balde, Zaluska too.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Over the season yes, easily and when you add in the young players who's left wages the club have raked back a few quid this summer.}

30 Jul 2015 18:17:57
Few million really. If we don't see significant investment I say we all sport the vendetta masks and start a revolution. It worked for Lazio.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 18:23:16
Our business model ensure we impose a glass ceiling upon ourselves. PL talks of being back where we belong. He seems to think that investing buttons somehow equates to CL. Every time we are nearly ready to move up a notch we sell, returning us to mediocrity in European terms.

Ambrose being able to get a place on the bench is synonymous with our level, awaiting Forrest to reach potential only the reality challenged see also reflects a position at odds with PL's pronouncements of our place in football.

VVD will leave and we will again take a step back. We need a left back and CB too to try and reduce the impact. A total expenditure, net , of £500k tells you all you need to know.

Once again we are on a knife edge against at team no one had ever heard of. The prize of up to 20 million involved an investment third division teams in England make to compete in the Gregg's Pie League, so, it shouldn't come as a surprise when we get our baws parted, but strangely is because of our own aspirations.

I still think we will progress against Quohog's finest. But I won't be wandering the streets in a shocked, numbing stupor if we exit.

Celtic in the 21st Century. Hope for the best, but don't expect it.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 18:34:03
You don't need to spend big to get quality. You need a scouting network that is effective. John Park is not the answer as he cannot identify a striker

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 18:44:29
I really worry at where the trimming and cutting will stop? Below I mentioned the Strachan era when he inherited, huge earners, ageing stars and a bit of unrest along the way.
He was given a limited budget and a clear-out mandate and still managed to attract European class players, maintain our domestic challenge (with a strong rival) and had some amazing European nights and results against the cream of Europe in the group stages.
OK he made a couple of iffy signings, but he was able to keep the bulk of the team together as opposed to now, where we sign lesser players, struggle with a lone striker and any potential stars can't wait to get out the door.
The club has been in a unique position since 2012 with virtual certainty of CL football and we have failed to make the most of this by not consolidating and strengthening.

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 20:36:51
Well said Jungle Jim, I can't disagree with any of the points you make.
I noticed Middlesbrough, are spending a bit of money in an effort to get to the Premier league in England, their chairman has been there for years and loves their club, he wouldn't put their future at risk, but is prepared to invest in an effort to try and get his club to the next level.
All the Celtic fans want is for our board to do what they can to get us to the next level, it wouldn't cost a fortune, and I doubt it would bankrupt the club.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - But... but ... spend money... look at Rangers... liquidation...wibble ;( That's the usual standard reply to anyone who mentions Pedro should loosen the purse strings, Gerry, do you think he has the club and the fans best interests at heart or are is his own personal interests and power trip now his priority? Is his bonus affected by player ins and outs?}

30 Jul 2015 22:56:06
The bottom line is that it does'nt matter how much you spend if you play the wrong system,RD has been to the mountain top and he has had a dream ,playing one up and a pressing game is the way to salvation,he does'nt understand that ciftci is a very good old fashioned inside forward, play him and Griffiths together and Griffiths will score a barrowload against anyone,creativity in midfield is the most important thing lacking,I would suggest playing Henderson instead of Johannson.

Agree0 Disagree1

31 Jul 2015 00:53:36
Aindoh, the fact RD has LG and NC to choose from is kind of the problem. It's not about which one he picks. It's about him having to pick one of them. Or both.

Agree0 Disagree0

31 Jul 2015 01:00:38
Wasn't young Johannson player of the year . Wasn't young Hendeerson sent
out on loan , and has come back with injury . Rogic is a likier replacement for
Johannson in the near future than Henderson

Agree0 Disagree0

31 Jul 2015 03:46:24
Didn't we get Johanson in to cover for Rogic whilst he was injured? :P

Agree0 Disagree1

31 Jul 2015 18:58:01
Sorry for taking so long to reply to you ED.
I can't help wondering if Lawwell would rather win the league but make a loss, or finish runner up and make a profit, I suspect it's probably the latter, as he gets his bonus, and he can lay the blame at the manager's door.

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 11:29:08
I forgot to add earlier some of my ex bear pals had big bets on Qarabagh at 13/2 and bigger (some bookies were as big as 8/1) so I had a wee smile to myself at them and all the other sevconians who bet against a Scottish team.
There are mug gamblers everywhere ( sorry with my tongue so firmly in my cheek it hurts lol)

Believable0 Unbelievable1

30 Jul 2015 13:37:26
Gambler should be found under Mug in the dictionary. :)

Haven't met one yet who is ahead. Not by a long shot.

Every now and then they get a win that keeps their wallets open for the bookie to help himself.

Still, people could say the same fir my Alchemy Lab.

Same thing really.

Agree2 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 08:22:03
Well a one goal lead, not ideal but not losing an away goal could be crucial. Celtic in first half were poor and so many misplaced passes, second half better, Ciftci? still not convinced, we were better when Commons came on. As for Qarabagh, what I expected a well organised, defensive minded team who came for a draw and almost got it, on the plus point for me is this team do not seem to score a lot of goals, in last round the Montenegran minnows held them 0-0 over there, Celtic need an away goal, if we get it, I cannot see them scoring 3 goals, but a much better performance is needed by whole team over there.

Believable3 Unbelievable1

30 Jul 2015 08:44:27
Again I don't think we did ourselves justice. The possession was pretty even looking at the stats this morning. I didn't think that sat there given the balance of play. And that may be reflected by the fact we had twice as many attacks. 5 shots on goal to their one, which was a tame free kick. Like you say sloppy in the final third again. I understand what Ciftci brings over Griffiths, bur last night was about getting as comfortable a lead as possible and Griffiths is a much better goalscorer. Anyway, a lead is better than a deficit. They have to come out at us a bit more in the second leg and again, like Stjarnan, that will suit our game. Still confident of seeing that lot off.

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 10:52:16
Timalloy I've never been convinced by cifti mate. For money we spent, there are far better options in that price range. Its starting to really pi$$ me off the fact John Park is still Head Scout. He has failed far too many times in identifying a suitable striker. Apart from Hooper and Griffiths, he has continually let us down.

Agree2 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 11:34:58
I would take a few players if he finds a lustig, Johansen, Bitton, Van Dijk, Wanyama, Izzy, Etc etc. He does a good job. Obviously every signing isn't going to be a huge hit which goes for every team but he gets more good players than he doent.

Agree0 Disagree1

30 Jul 2015 12:02:15
Parks problem has always been with strikers. His record with midfielders/defenders is ok. I think that even with Hooper and Griffiths, he was pointed towards them by others within the club. We need someone who has some knowledge about the forward positions to identify people that match our needs.

Agree2 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 16:00:33
I agree arrowh. Its alarming the amount we have lost through Parks striker targets. Bangura, Balde, Pukki, Fridjohnson to name a few

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 07:14:42
Honestly what is the point of James Forest?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - it is to give people something to moan about when you are winning and to give those sat in row z a feeling of involvement in the game when they have to dodge his crosses.}

30 Jul 2015 07:35:57
That's Scott Brown's passing that gives fans in row Z a feeling of involvement

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 08:10:52
Was that you sitting in front of me last night who actually booed forrest when he came on? He wasn't great last night but who was? We were needing another wide player on the pitch. Give me strength!

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 08:27:57
For all the drama and arguments that went on last year when LW beat us, and all the promises of great things to come, a year down the line and I am still waiting to see us "dominate in Europe". The squad is slightly better than this time last year. The squad are probably fitter. Irn Bru is off the menu, unfortunately the players required to succeed at CL level are not at Celtic Park. Quarabag are about the same level as Celtic. This is only the 3rd qualifying round. Tougher opponents await. I don't know how RD planned to dominate teams with the players at his disposal? Last night we yet again show nothing in the final third of the pitch. The ball does not come into the box quick enough or often enough. I just don't like how we set the team out. Glad to get the win but overall a disappointing evening.

Agree0 Disagree2

30 Jul 2015 08:36:22
Johnny if you think it only takes a year to turn a team into s dominating European team you're delusional. This isn't football manager or FIFA. This is real life and it takes time and may even take a few years before we see progress in Europe.

Agree3 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 08:47:07
I'm not a fan of Forrest, but last night he came on and was direct and gave us something different from Armstrong who I thought had a poor game. Give him a break, always someone having a go.

I haven't seen a post saying well done to the wee man for 3 important tackles after tracking his man 70 yards and helping out lustig. Does all that not matter though after he had one bad cross (which came after having to control the ball on his head and keep in after a shocking pass!)

Agree2 Disagree1

30 Jul 2015 10:54:29
@ed001 The actual purpose of playing James Florist is to create a handicap and give opposition a chance lol

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - sounds fair to me, though maybe a one goal start for the SPFL opposition as well would even it up a bit more?}

30 Jul 2015 11:29:37
Not biggest forrest fan but give him his due he was willing to run at the left back and try and create something where's gms only ran at him when forrest was stripped and standing waiting to come on. Then once seen it was Armstrong that went off and moved over never tried to run at the other full back

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 13:43:42
Being willing to run is not enough. His final baw, his decision making are utter pish. His shooting us a joke. He will beat the player then put in a pish baw 80% of the time. In fact more than that.

We haven't had one bid for him. Not one. Says it all. Needs hunted.

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - You're being far too kind, he's not as good as that. I've said it for the past four years that Forrest is one of THE worst players I've ever seen in a CFC top - and that includes trialists, guest players in charity matches and players who've swapped jerseys with our players after matches.}

30 Jul 2015 14:57:14
@henriks tongue . If your referring to me I've never booed aCeltic player in my puff but doesn't stop me having a view on players . The trouble with Forest is that being a first team squad player he actually thinks he's better than he actually is . Maybe Deila sees him as an attacking midfielder but to me he's a winger and always will be albeit not a very good one who has never progressed since he first came into team

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 15:00:51
Can someone tell me a player whose final ball was good last night? Other than commons corner? Again like I say Forrest is frustrating, but nobody in that team is perfect?

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 16:07:05
Brian McLaughlin back in early 90s was La Liga class wing wizard compared to James Forrest and that is saying something cause I thought he was one of the $hittest players not only to wear the hoops, but football in general I have ever seen untill up steps Forrest.

Hope to god someone comes in for Forrest and gets him to f*ck out of our lives once and for all. i'm giving Deila the benefit of the doubt and suggesting Forrest is only getting a game to put him in the shop window so to speak

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 16:10:01
One of the worst players ed? Come on.
I'm not his biggest fan but it seems that the fans need a player to have a go at and now it's forrest. A few guys around me last night could only see the mistakes he was making. Armstrong, brown, johansen all had a bad game. Let's hope he can keep fit and you never know, he might surprise us.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Now it's Forrest? I've been saying it for four years mate. Yeah Brown and Johansen had a bad game but that's uncommon whereas Forrest's poor performance are dire whenever we're unlucky enough that he's fit to play.
Name me one player who's spent so long at CFC and being as useless and pointless as Forrest, remembering this is his seventh season now - the same amount of seasons Larsson played for us - has he progressed any in those 7 seasons or is he still the same injury prone inconsistent player he was 6 years ago? Some of our worst players weren't given 7 seasons to try and turn it round so why should Forrest?
It's like listening to Liverpool supporters about how it's always going to be next season when they win the league.
I wonder if Spurs are still interested in giving us £9 million for him? (rofl)

30 Jul 2015 16:57:36
Yeah now it's forrest. It was Ambrose and Sammy before him. He's been injured a lot, granted. But when fit he is a threat going forward. To say he's one of the worst players we've ever had is a ridiculous statement. Do you remember the 90s?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - 4 years of saying something doesn't mean it's a new thing. Who are you comparing him to in the 90's and did any of them get 7 seasons?
To say Forrest is a threat going forward is a ridiculous statement with about 22 assists in 7 seasons the only threat he is is to his health, you might think different but the stats tell a very different story, the stats and anyone that's unlucky enough to have seen him playing.
I have never heard anyone outside the CFC support say that they think Forrest is a good player in recent years but to some it's it's the same old story that you're not allowed to say a CFC player's garbage. I'd also question his bottle and guts as much as his ability, he doesn't have the self confidence to play for a big club, the slightest knock or niggle and he's on the treatment table.
Give me a straight yes or no, would you be disappointed or unhappy if Forrest left?}

30 Jul 2015 17:49:02
I didn't say you specifically, I said the supporters always need a player who can do no right.
Let's not forget he's still only 24. Larsson was 26 when he signed for us so you're comparing apples and oranges.
Here is a list of players who were worse: Biggins, Mo Kamara, Henri Camara, Paul Byrne, Raphael Schiedt, Mark McNally, Regi Blinker, Cilian Sheridan, Chris Killen, David Hannah, Adam Virgo, Du Wei, Dion Dublin, Ian Wright, Barry Smith. to name a few.
No I wouldn't be unhappy OR disappointed if Forrest left but I cannot stand supporters booing any Celtic player.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - I'm totally against booing your own players, if they're out on the park they deserve your support but that doesn't stop you thinking they're not good enough. I wouldn't say Forrest is any better or any worse than those you've listed, none of them were given 7 seasons to prove themselves at CFC and most of them had a better career than Forrest has had, I'm sure Ian Wright wishes he could have played like James Forrest.
If you yourself wouldn't miss him then how can you argue that he's a good player, don't you want us to keep our good players? When everyone was on Scott Brown's back and I was fighting his corner on here I'd have been gutted to see him leave whereas other would have happily drove him to any other team.

30 Jul 2015 18:18:41
I'm not saying Ian Wright didn't have a fantastic career. I was stating he was awful for us. Maybe you missed my point, I couldn't care less what kind of careers these guys had pre/post Celtic. You don't think Forrest has been better than David Hannah or Rafael Scheidt?
I already said i'm not his biggest fan, i'm really not. My point was he's still only 24 and when the fans get on his back after one misplaced pass or whatever it really annoys me. He did a good job tracking back last night which was missed by the anti Forrest brigade.
Last night we were needing a winger on and he came on and did ok. But if you didn't see the game and read some of the posts on here you'd think he was the worst player on the park.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Well it depends what you count as a good career. If you think sitting injured and sponging a wage you haven't earned for seven seasons a success that's your prerogative, I've got different ideas. I don't think Forrest is a better calibre of player than David Hannah or big Scheidt, did you back them and want them given more time, why's Forrest any different?
It was great to see him tracking back last night, it only took him 7 seasons to learn that, by the time he's 30 he might have learnt to cross a ball - I can't wait.
The fact that there is even an anti-Forrest brigade speaks for itself, a NATO standard brigade consists of approximately 3,200 to 5,500 soldiers, that's about 10% of our stadium support.
Thankfully I'm in the pro-Celtic movement and want what's best for the club, team and the supporters, because people have an opinion different to yours doesn't mean them anti anything, that's just you using a negative term to try and score a cheap point as though people can't think for themselves
Were you part of all the anti- Biggins, Mo Kamara, Henri Camara, Paul Byrne, Raphael Schiedt, Mark McNally, Regi Blinker, Cilian Sheridan, Chris Killen, David Hannah, Adam Virgo, Du Wei, Dion Dublin, Ian Wright and Barry Smith brigades or was it one big group all lumped in together?
And without being pedantic, some of those players you've listed didn't play for us in the 90s.}

30 Jul 2015 19:51:54
I'm aware of that, but I never said they all played in the 90s. They were just examples of bad players for Celtic. Haha so Forrest does a good thing by tracking back and still gets stick for it. Instead of criticising Forrest for taking a wage for the past 7 years why don't you criticise the people who paid him it. Would you turn it down? But like I said, I'm not his biggest fan. Was just trying to put my point across in a less condescending way than you. Doesn't make either of us right.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - You didn't put any point across, all you've that YOU want CFC fans not to say Forrest is horse$hit for the sole reason that it upsets you and he tracked back last night, you even agree that he's not a good player, so what exactly was your point?}

30 Jul 2015 20:58:23
Lol ok mate. My point was James Forrest was far from our worst player last night but you wouldn't think that from reading this thread. Also I heard some fans booing him when he came on last night which annoyed me. That ok?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Booing player's is out of order in my opinion and I hate seeing that myself but just because the team as a whole had an off night doesn't change the fact that Forrest is a player who has been consistently diabolical over a number of seasons.}

30 Jul 2015 23:00:35
forrest hasn't improved at all since his first year. that may be down to our coaching as much as his ability but I think he would benefit by going elsewhere

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Of course our coaching has to take some of the responsibility, just as it is responsible for not producing enough players at a level to make our first team squad. The frightening thing is that we don't have a player at 18/19 who could be a more productive addition - and cost less in wages - than James Forrest.}

30 Jul 2015 23:53:11
Lots of heartfelt comments ,but where is the critiscim of RD

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Some of RD's decisions are a bit strange but I don't think you can blame him for James Forrest being an awful footballer. Picking Forrest is by far one of his most questionable decisions but as the old saying goes, sometimes you can only pi$$ with the c*ck you've got.}

31 Jul 2015 00:21:39
You can't blame RD for any footballers ability ,but you can blame him for playing players out of position,for leaving players out who have been playing well,for including players who haven't been playig well,for ignoring younger players even though he's meant to be good at introducing younger players,for sticking to a system that's not working,where is his critisicsm,all the flak is aimed at Lawwell and Park,I think it is misplaced.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - But the thread was about James Forrest.}

31 Jul 2015 00:33:39
But RD picks James Forrest

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - So is he playing Forrest out of position, leaving out a RW that's been playing better than him or ignoring a young player for him? What young player would you play on the RW instead of Forrest, who's he keeping out the team? Nothing you've said has any relevance to James Forrest..}

31 Jul 2015 00:54:19
RD picks James Forrest,thats the relevance,sorry can't remember if you are pro Forrest or anti .,do you agree Forrest should be in the team or not?I was out of the country yesterday and didn't see the game,but why is everyone slagging Forrest,he is not the best ,he is not the worst,we know what he is capable of,but RD picks the teamm,sets the system,where are his critics?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - We seen the game, that's why everyone's having a pop at Forrest, you're having a pop at the manager for a 1-0 win in a CL qualifier you didn't even see - thank God we didn't get beat!}

31 Jul 2015 08:19:40
We put in a poor 'team' performance and there's a meltdown about a player who was on the park for half an hour lolz

Agree1 Disagree0

31 Jul 2015 13:47:39
Living in england the only people I know who think forrest has any talent are people who refuse to watch the spfl and only play fifa

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 00:58:19
Am I correct in thinking that failure in the return leg means no European football this season? I haven't seen it mentioned (and it is surely unthinkable).

Never managed to watch the game today, but the reports aren't surprising: lacking creativity up front. Its no mystery; I just wonder what plans may be in place to remedy the deficiency. None, I'm beginning to suspect.

Believable0 Unbelievable2

30 Jul 2015 01:26:59
I'm sure if we fail to beat Qarabag we would fall into a Europa League playoff.

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 02:43:56
if we exit in this 3rd qualifying round we go in to a europa league lay off match for access to europa league; if we go through against the azerbaijanis, but go out in the ECL playoff match, we are guaranteed a europa league group place

Agree1 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 03:42:41
thanks Paradise :D

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 06:15:32
Cavalcanti. the team didn't play bad last night it was more that the were not as fluent as they could have been with Johnson and Armstrong off their usual game and gms a bit isolated out eight .allied to some slack passing in the final third .They were a very well organised fit team who sat in looking for a counter . was this them at their best? it certainly wasn't our best and I think we have enough to go through

Agree2 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 08:51:44
How does the playoff work ed? Can we only play one of the teams who were playing last night if we get through? Basle, Salzburg etc? Any help on this Ed?

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 15:38:13
If I'm being honest it's been a long time since I've seen Johanson on this "usual" game everyone keeps taking about. His commitment cannot be questioned, but his final ball and passing in general at times is atrocious and thinks that he is one of the only people RD refuses to drop as he is one of his own. I have noticed recently aswell that when he makes a mistake he starts blaming people around him. Done it last night with Stevens and we've been over the penalty nonsense with Griffiths, but another aspect I'm concerned with atm

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 18:24:42
tompo88, it is seeding/co-efficient based. CFC are 5th seeds. IF (and its a big IF) we go through and the other teams with coefficients of 1,2,3,4 6,7,8,9 and 10 prevail, we would play any one of 6,7,8,9,and 10. We cannot play seeds 1,2,3,or 4 as the top 5 seeds are in pot 1 and the next best 5 coefficients are in pot 2

so, we cannot play Basle, Red Bull, Salzburg or Steau Bucharest. we could end up playing the lies of macabbi, APOEL, BATE or Zagreb

basically, its top 5 coefficients left after 3rd qualifying round in pot 1 and next best coefficients remaining in pot 2 …celtic in pot 1

Agree0 Disagree0

30 Jul 2015 00:13:15
LM67 -I agree 100%with you when you play 1 up front it's not all about that striker getting the goals it's about holding the ball and bringing other players into the game and attacking as a unit!

Believable1 Unbelievable0

 
Change Consent