Celtic Banter Archive July 24 2017

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

24 Jul 2017 22:25:25

Good luck, Izzy. YNWA




For God and Izzy!

izzy
Believable13 Unbelievable1

24 Jul 2017 22:30:38
Well said bhoy was a class act wish him well and sad to see him go.

Agree5 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 22:32:01
Legend.

Agree2 Disagree1

25 Jul 2017 00:13:13
Ah Emilio. Too bad really. I reckon he must have taught wee KT a good bit of bombing on over the years. Hurry back hombre!

Agree3 Disagree0

25 Jul 2017 04:23:33
A class player and an even better person, thanks izzy
HH.

Agree1 Disagree0

25 Jul 2017 08:17:56
Love Izzy, he was so giving that he taught wee Tierney so well that he took his place, god speed on your next journey Emilio and haste ye back .

Agree1 Disagree0

25 Jul 2017 10:09:20
Lovely punter, will be missed.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Jul 2017 10:28:15
Seems to be one of a diminishing breed of Footballer, skilful, talented but above all a real sportsman with respect and dignity in abundance. Good luck to you Izzy and your lovely family. we shall meet again. Hail, Hail.

Agree0 Disagree1

26 Jul 2017 00:08:12
Superb way to say goodbye to a true Celt . Great player and servant. The best South American to grace the famous hoops. Farewell Izzy 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 HH God bless.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 21:38:34
The bold zidane always seems to have something good to say about our club eh guys.

Believable9 Unbelievable0

24 Jul 2017 22:34:58
Aye but Dave king says it doesn't count because sevco were not in the conversation! 😂😂😂😂😂😂.

Agree4 Disagree0

25 Jul 2017 01:24:02
We need to now get a LB and CH as we now have 6 1st team defenders wae two injured and two who could come in Ralston and Ajer who need more 1st team action.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Jul 2017 08:20:03
Lol 😁 LH86, that mans slavering is a comedy gift from god 😆.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jul 2017 11:43:57
Lh86 quality mate nothing happened if it was up to that shyster, Mon the hoops 💚💚💚.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 19:53:15
A wee trivial thing here why does everyone reply to Welsbhoy as Welshbhoy? I always thought he was a Tim from Wales until I noticed his name wasn't Welshbhoy. 🤔🤔.

Believable2 Unbelievable1

{Ed007's Note - That's because he can't type! Or spell, one of the two or both.....

24 Jul 2017 20:01:07
Or pissed when he did type it!

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 20:41:15
we all got it wrong at 1st however Ed`s right esp after a few sherbets lol.

Agree1 Disagree0

25 Jul 2017 23:57:56
a kin spell


It was meant to be welshbhoy bloody phone text when i signed up.

And yer right Stevie I'm a tim from glasgow living in Wales.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 19:46:10
What's everybody's thoughts for Wednesday's line up? I'd start Armstrong alongside Brown and have Erik and Jozo at CB.

Believable0 Unbelievable2

24 Jul 2017 20:01:34
Back three Brown/ Lustig Simunovic And Tierney with Lustig/ Forrest Macgregor/ Brown and Armstrong Sinclair Ntcham and Mossa.

Agree0 Disagree1

24 Jul 2017 20:07:06
Armstrong can sit in the stand. make him play his hand instead of all the waiting signing a contract or not. either way let the club know so we can deal with the situation accordingly. ps is there another Qualifier after the Rosenberg game.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Yes Daz, one more round to go. The Play-off round.}

24 Jul 2017 20:35:27
Cheers ed. Am I correct in thinking we will have to play 4 Qualifiers next year ed.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - I don't think it's definite yet but it could happen, I think it'll depend on our co-efficient under the new rules.}

24 Jul 2017 20:43:16
Ed WHEN we get by R/ berg, any idea of the calibre of team we could be up against and are we seeded again.
Thx.

Agree1 Disagree1

{Ed007's Note - Courtesy of Melbhoy:

19 Jul 2017 23:35:55
So, should we get past Rosenborg the best 5 teams we could face will be:

BATE Borisov
Legia Warsaw
APOEL
Maribor
Qarabag


Nice trip to Cyprus perhaps? Just to mix it up a bit.
Melb Bhoy

24 Jul 2017 21:50:48
Legia Warsaw now that could be interesting.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 18:31:49
Guys got my ticket today for wed, and on the top of the left hand side of it it says "Rangers Support".
Wtf is that all about lol, has anyone else got that on their brief.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

24 Jul 2017 18:46:29
Soz forgot to say its in Jock Stein upper 440.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 19:42:52
Does it not say "Are Scum" after it rayman 🤣🤣.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 19:53:04
No Stevie, it's because if another banner goes up we can blame it on the " Rangers support " :-P.

Agree1 Disagree1

24 Jul 2017 20:01:32
Ha ha never thought of that Jamie 🤣.

Agree0 Disagree1

24 Jul 2017 20:44:05
jamie. class mate.

Agree1 Disagree1

24 Jul 2017 22:09:15
TY Peter/ Stevie :-D.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Jul 2017 23:57:15
Must have missed that part stevie mibi never got all the printing right lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 15:14:39
Been well documented last few days people thoughts on the gb so posting this isn't so people can bring it all up again.
As u know I'm not in the gb but I am like many others one of the bhoys banned from next 2 home games. That ban has now been extended to 5 games (2 home 3 away) .
Now I'd like your thoughts not on the gb but on how Celtic have handled the situation.
Situation being that 900 fans have been banned most of which aren't in the gb which Celtic have put us all under one blanket. Now here's the repercussions and I speak only of my own Csc bear in mind many will now be affected. Over 20 season book holders and run a bus to all games now some of us banned some of us not we have bus booked for hearts game and bus booked for Sunderland away ( which is included in the ban) bus still has to be paid for now if all of us banned don't go costs club more or members going more as numbers are down now think if that scenario for many of the other clubs that include the 900 banned. It's a joke I spoke with lad who runs a bigger club than us and just for the Sunderland game with not knowing exactly what's what if he cancels bus it will cost his Csc £1700 which wipes them out before season starts.

Believable6 Unbelievable2

24 Jul 2017 16:25:14
Complain to the GB then. they constantly let the club down with political and IRA rubbish . they are excellent when it comes down to the football support so concentrate on that and leave the rule breaking to the other mob. fines are now up to the hundreds of thousands of pounds . give it a rest.

Agree11 Disagree5

24 Jul 2017 16:26:18
Maybe the GB should think about the implications for others when they start their nonsense carry on. They have been warned before and the club needs to come down hard on them. HH.

Agree9 Disagree6

24 Jul 2017 16:45:58
Lack of sympathy for situation of Weshbhoy and the likes is disgraceful. This blanket action could wreck a lot of CSC's funding for good part of the season. Not everyone gets a bus or walks up Gallowgate for the game. For some people there are coaches, boats, trains and hotels costing 100s before the ticket. Haven't said much about the GB situation as more than enough opinions shared, reckon most on here know where I would stand anyway. If your outrage about some displays outweighs your concern for a fellow fan, you're not really up to the mark in terms of what should be expected of a Celtic supporter.

Agree7 Disagree2

24 Jul 2017 16:50:18
Welshboy 'Better to punish the innocent than let the guilty go free' would appear to be the old adage which applies in this case. Seems an over the top reaction to me but I don't think that Celtic have much option to be fair. Without getting involved in the rights or wrongs of the banner again it doesn't seem to take much to offend people when the shoes in the other foot in Scotland but the thing that does worry me is the GBs unrepentant attitude particularly with regard to the Rodgers banner which I really don't think he appreciated and if it continued I think the man is prinipled enough to resign.

Agree6 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 16:50:34
I would check it out with the Citizens advice bureau or something similar Welshboy.
I can't see how the club can ban you from an away ground when you have bought your ticket quite openly and legally, and you have broken no rules. Surely at least it should be the away club that imposes a ban, and then only after explaining what reason they have for banning you.
I would guess that the club has every right to refuse to sell a ticket to you, they can sell tickets to whoever they like, but once that ticket has been sold to you, I would have thought that the club would need to have a reason to stop you using it.
At the very least, you should contact the club and ask for an explanation.

Agree4 Disagree1

24 Jul 2017 16:55:55
It's a sore one for fans like your self Welsh bhoy! When it's putting fans who aren't even associated with the GB out of pocket and restricting them supporting there team then there's something seriously wrong there! But on the flip side it shows how serious the club is about stamping this nonsense out! I'm not going to go over old ground because Im tired of it and have made my feelings clear about the GB! But I do have massive sympathy for u and the bhoys in your club mate, it leaves a bad taste to be honest! And it puts the club in conflict with regular fans like yourself who have nothing to do with all this!

Agree3 Disagree3

24 Jul 2017 17:06:24
WB i think the club have been looking to do this for a while. They are now in a position where all season tickets are sold and for the 1st time in years there is a waiting list so for them its now easy to say do as your told or you don't get to follow Celtic, tickets will be sold elsewhere if need be. Its unfortunate guys like yourself miss out because of others. I said my bit over the weekend on the IRA issue and individuals. I think this ban is just the start and season tickets will be removed completely if the Club are fined again. The GB bring so much to CP and will be a massive loss on Wednesday. The football songs/ banners at 99.9% of games are incredible. I said yesterday the only ones to benefit from this will be Rosenborg but i can now add your liver to the list.

Agree4 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 17:25:23
I wasn't looking for sympathy in my post I personally will take the ban on the chin and see what happens moving on. Pretty clear for the most part how people feel about the gb actions on here I'd be hypocritical if I didn't stand with them on this as although the banner wasn't my doing I didn't disagree with it at the time and joined in with the singing etc and no doubt would again.
What I do disagree with is how the club have handled it and the timing. Not disputing that as a club they have to be seen to take action but surely there was a better way to go about it.

Agree4 Disagree1

{Ed007's Note - I'd be asking the Club for full disclosure of any information regarding you they have provided to any authorities or 3rd parties and remind them of the Data Protection Act, are you on any police lists now as a potential troublemaker at football, that kind of thing. This could have serious implications for all of you mate.}

24 Jul 2017 18:30:04
I feel really sorry for you WB And all others in your position Celtic have got it so wrong in this I can't see the logic of it all celtic must know who is in the GB.

Agree3 Disagree2

24 Jul 2017 18:41:16
Spot on Ed007. Letter from Welshboy should be very brief. Dear Celtic. why am I banned? ☘️.

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - It's a stupid decision and is quickly becoming a PR disaster for the Club. I'd want to know what they were accusing me of doing and how they can punish me when they can't provide proof I broke any stadium rules.}

24 Jul 2017 18:46:42
All tickets in that section had to be got through the green brigade hence the stance Celtic have taken so that's making some sense. There are talks due this week so hopefully get sorted.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - I didn't know that, I'd say that was a bit stupid of the Club to allow that. I hope you do get something sorted out mate.}

24 Jul 2017 19:13:05
A few weeks ago I was ecstatic after a unique season of record-breaking successes, trophies-a-plenty and some of the best football I have seen from a Celtic team in decades However, in a few short, recent weeks we have unsettled players, squabbling support and divisions in the ranks; amid bans, fines, controversy, criticism and self-harming.
Our rivals are light years behind us and we have one of the best young managers around with a sincere love of Celtic, so is it not possible to screw the nut, focus on what's good about supporting and playing for this magical club and stop stockpiling our detractors, enemies and objectors with ammunition that drags our good name down to their levels.

Agree4 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 19:21:29
Spot on Ed with your point. On what is a very important game the attention drawn to this decision is unbelievable. What must BR be thinking to himself?

This has been a PR disaster but I also think the GB's attempt at taking ownership has also been a PR disaster with their half baked apology. Look at the backlash from other fans.

I have totak sympathy for fans like welsbhoy and the like who happen to be in that section. Why Peter Lawell couldn't wait until after this fixture to make a decision I'll never know.

Time out, a clear head and an open dialogue with the GB to make them fully aware that they have gone too far may have been the answer after the game and saved penalising those who don't deserve it.

The GB are a fantastic element of our support but they risk undoing all their good work if they don't toe the line.

On a final point, what are the leaders of the GB doing? Are they going to be leaders or just cheerleaders!

Agree2 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 19:27:57
Although I voiced my opinion on the banner I think your situation, and that of others in your section, is disgraceful. It is ridiculous that a blanket punishment has been dished out. The Club must have CCTV footage covering every inch of the stadium that would make it easy to identify those holding up the banner. At the very least the CCTV would identify those they have found guilty by proximation to the GB. They should be reimbursing every person in the section. **** sake it isn't 1971 and this isn't Operation Demetrius.

Agree1 Disagree1

24 Jul 2017 19:47:55
WB Just looking for clarity mate

All tickets in that section need to go through GB? Surely not?

That would class everyone in there a GB Member? plus even more daft of the club to have given them that powerbase?

Agree2 Disagree1

24 Jul 2017 20:37:51
I heard at time that about green brigade having say in ticket.
Thought it was mental decision by the club then and still do.
They gave the GB to much power and it's came back to bite them on the arse.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 20:43:17
Welsbhoy its unfair supporters like yourself are being penalised. I never knew full extent. Hope you get it sorted.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 20:55:25
Only the front section ie the 900 banned
No doesn't make everyone a member it was a choice for those of us wanting to be in the "singing section" so to speak. No offence but I'm not one for just sitting watching the game the atmosphere in there is electric at times and can't wait for things to get back to the way it should be so we can get back on track and support the team.
I wouldn't say it was a powerbase jamie remember if celtic didn't want what the section brings then why would they have gone through with standing in 1st place, why would they build a stand for the capos as i've said before it suits the brand when all is going well.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 21:37:17
It seems a bit ott but GB boxed the club into a corner with their statement of defiance. You can't just state you will continue to do what you want and expect the club to sit back and hope that UEFA will not increase the next punishment if what the GB does is against the competition rules. I for one, would be extremely pissed off if the club played closed door games or worse because the GB or anyone else decided THEY were above the rules. Love the GB but there are other places and forums where they can do as they wish which will have no effect on the club or its supporters.

Agree2 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 21:38:10
WB That's even more confusing mate!

What 52k season ticket holders? 900 in that section, one would imagine the ratios more would want in?

Who decides who gets in ( no in )

Do you tick the "am a good singer" in your application? do you get kicked out for not being lively enough / or not renewed?

Who DO YOU apply to the GB?

Ed tell me this is not the case please? It cannot be?

Agree1 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - It's the first I've heard of it mate but WB will know what he's talking about. It seems a bit crazy to put that power in any fans group hands and is a bit of a recipe for disaster - never mind can you sing, do they ask if your asthmatic, WB? ;)

24 Jul 2017 22:11:10
Tbh I'd be lying if I knew the exact process I buy my ticket through my Csc and asked to get in that section bhoy who runs it in turn asked who he asks and I was in. Can't really shed anymore light on it than that.
Asthmatic ed? Ooft I could do with an inhaler after 67 lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Ah the old 'I know a guy that knows a guy' ruse ;) Got you, say no more squire.}

24 Jul 2017 22:19:04
Feckin Madness Ed, WB not a pop at you buddy but they have a parent n child section, corporate section, disabled section it's just accommodating a section mate

If you need to go through the GB, somebody has to be vetting / deciding that? Who is that? Jeez Oh is it a committee?

What you seem to be suggesting means your application is being passed for someone else to decide!? FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT THAT CANNOT BE? Come on Ed you have done this long enough mate! how n who made this possible?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Well it wasn't feckin' me!! Gerry Adams?}

24 Jul 2017 22:27:11
Haha good answer ed.
Jamie yer like a dog wi a bone here lol the ins and outs I really don't know and that's me being honest mate.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - It's the only bone he gets since he done his back in lifting his wallet.}

24 Jul 2017 22:31:04
well whose Unseen Fenian Hand is it pmsl

You can't blame that one on the good Pedro he would never let that power slide lol

Hoopy get the final say he's cuddily after all? (Y)

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - I'm amazed that walloper Ronnie Hawthorn allowed it.}

25 Jul 2017 00:32:01
I think it is ridiculous that Lawwell is linking up the GB behaviour of the last league match in May and Our Qualiflier in middle of July . Although I was behind the other goals I thought the lighting up and creating a blaze was decidedly dangerous . Celtic should have blacklisted G B immediately and had meetings before any decision on them getting Season books this season .
Could they not have been allocated seats at the very rear of a stand in a less prominent position until Board would be happy about their on going behaviour .
Getting off with the Hearts fire display must have given them a false sense of security and untouchable.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - If I can remember right, Chris, I either read it or someone told me that all banners etc are made with or covered with a fire retardant chemical type of thing.}

25 Jul 2017 13:06:01
As ever WB is right mate my back is goosed :- (

But can you imagine the damage I would have done if I had lifted Ed's wallet?

Feek me that's got more big NOTES in it than Beethoven's symphony :-P (Y)

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - They're only big because they're old five bob notes!}

25 Jul 2017 23:56:07
the club can't pass any information onto any agency without informing the individual concerned that they are about to do so unless of course the authorities specifically inquire about an individual in the line of persuing a criminal investigation or the club believe that a criminal act has taken place.

just to supply a list of 900 season ticket holders would not be accepted by the procurstor fiscal and if it happened the club would be open to civil claims under data protection act. So that's not going to happen. I love what the GB bring. However the GB need to understand that they don't speak for all supporters or the club.

You can't put Brendon Rodgers image or anyone elses image on a banner regardless of what the meaning of the banner is without permission especially an IRA assosisted banner. If the national newspaper did it or you printed it on this site he could bring a claim and he would probably win.

An apology at least would need to be issued. so no matter what, that particular banner is out of order. This is a decent man who as far as i know has no political agenda. Its wrong. BR has asked the GB to behave as required by the club. If their view is we will continue as we see fit then its going to end up with a ban for a season or for life.

don't agree that its the way forward but they can't dictate what they will or will not do. If they want to assosiate the club with para military organisations then its not for me and i would support the club and BR on further action to stop this.

Agree0 Disagree0

25 Jul 2017 23:54:30
the 900 of you should turn the tables on them welshy, don't buy anything out the club shops, don't use their food outlets, don't the stadium bookies, that mob don't like losing money, they wouldn't have dared shut the jungle down for banners or chanting as that held 9000, encourage other fans to boycott club outlets too, this ban is just a disgrace.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 14:37:14
Doing well here lads that's 3 threads without the mention of a banner. Was beginning to think people were misreading banter page as banner page😉😉.

Believable3 Unbelievable1

25 Jul 2017 23:19:44
Oh the irony!

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 09:06:39
£20m Marseille will pay for Dembele! Tabloids talk some utter pish, if we sold him for anything short of £35m then the board need their heads sorted.

Believable4 Unbelievable3

24 Jul 2017 09:21:05
Never going to get £35m. He said had one good year in Scottish football. Will be around £20 m which would be great business. If he stays another year and we do well in Europe the next his rice will increase next summer.

Agree2 Disagree3

24 Jul 2017 09:38:51
Seems we quoted Chelsea 30 million so can't see us dropping 10 off it.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 10:07:12
Just read it. Would be gutted if he goes. What is the story, is the Club encouraging bids and actively looking to sell him? The kid himself has been fairly consistent in his interviews about being happy to stay, unless he is saying something different behind the scences?

I was really hoping we could keep this squad together for 3 seasons to see it develop and progress in Europe.

Agree3 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 10:13:47
Its sky reporting this so could be garbage remember they had him going to milan last month.

Agree1 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 10:17:40
I can't believe the club will sell him for 20 million, when you read the article it says we fought off 30 from Chelsea in the Xmas window . So his value has dropped after scoring 32 goals 🤔.

Agree2 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 10:29:05
Another no news day? Am I alone in thinking that Moussa's moments of brilliance hide a degree of inconsistency? Sure, on his day he is literally unstoppable but he has went of the boil on a good few occasions. Realise he is potentially a huge star but I don't think he's irreplaceable. The only issue would be time to recruit replacement (and the additional cover we need) .

Agree0 Disagree2

24 Jul 2017 10:29:52
20 mill and a 20% sell on fee would be fair business.

Agree1 Disagree3

24 Jul 2017 10:52:40
50 million to talk plus 25 pc sell on . then open talks. doesn't matter how many season s he's played in Scotland its not an spl club wanting to buy him. monaco just sold a full back for over 50 million. no such a thing as a fair price now the big leagues have seen to that. if someone wants him Then pay big or don't waste our time.

Agree1 Disagree1

24 Jul 2017 10:56:46
Well played 007 yet again. We'd all like a bit more but £20m would be a great turn on a player over one season. Not a chance he's leaving until after the CL qualifiers now though surely.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Cheers, JT but I wouldn't pay too much attention to the money being mentioned.}

24 Jul 2017 13:02:17
Could it be that Sky are linking him to these European clubs to try and get an EPL club to pull their finger out and sign him cos they know he's class and really want him to be playing in " the best league in the world"?

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 12:49:47
You think we'll demand more than that Ed?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - We've got to get more than that surely. The price for Dembele has been set and Chelsea matched that so unless anything's changed we should be talking there or there abouts but I'l double check with Ed002 when she's around.}

24 Jul 2017 13:37:46
Good man, thanks.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - No probs.}

25 Jul 2017 00:35:59
Honesty lads, did you forget we are playing an important Qualiflier on Wednesday and the media want to upset our supporters and put us off our excitement in the build up.
Jim White has an important job witch Sky Sports and so Sky are like SMSM, they bat for the other side.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 08:41:09
3 big decisions for BR to make going into Weds game. Firstly at CB, i think Lustig will remain at RB because with Gamboa injured the only realistic option is to go with Lustig and have Ralston as cover. So for me not having Lustig as a CB option means going with Ajer, 16 games in the SPL is good enough experience its time for him to start as i have no idea what has happened to Erik he looks slow, gets caught in possession and plays slack balls so he is not an option for me at the moment. So that's a back 4 of Lustig Ajer Simunovic Tierney. Decision 2 is right wing and id go with Hayes over Forrest for this one, Hayes has looked well up for it looks very direct and final ball looks better and Forrest can come on and do plenty damage after an hour. Sinclair will obviously start on the left so that leaves decision 3 which is a big one and based on me thinking Rogic will start that leaves 2 places to fill. Brown will start so like last week it will be between Armstrong and Ntcham. I can't decide on that one i am very impressed with Ntcham he looks a class act, i also think the same about Armstrong. Or will BR go with McGregor who continues to improve week by week. Griffiths being banned means there is no decision 4. Either way i think we have a very strong 11 and a very strong bench more than capable of putting this tie to bed Wed night. With the GB unfortunately not in attendance is up to the rest to get Parkhead rocking let's get right behind the Manager and the players and drive the team to victory. Put all this nonsense behind us and enjoy the great times we are seeing under BR its only going to get better and we need to unite and give them full backing. Leave the infighting to the shambles across the city. Safe journey to all attending.

Believable4 Unbelievable0

24 Jul 2017 09:11:58
Think erik will play to be honest.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 09:47:42
That would be a concern to me Kev. He hasn't had a decent game since Deila was in charge. If not Ajer i think id rather see Brown sit back for 1 game and have Armstrong and Ntcham start together. I don't know if its lack of game time or what or he just ain't interested but if he starts i hope proves me wrong and he plays like he did when he arrived because there's no doubting he is a decent player when at his best.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 10:09:33
Stan i would also go with young ajer but think brendan will opt for eriks experience as he's very familiar with rosenberg.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 10:26:24
How is he very familiar with Rosenberg?

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 10:27:00
Sher is very familiar with Rosenberg.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 10:29:43
If that's the case Mally i hope this the game he gets back to being his old self. I think by playing Ajer we would see him develop quickly like Tierney.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 10:45:36
Keep it clean am meaning he knows quite few of the rosenberg players there strengths and weaknesses its a Scandinavian thing and who knows maybe he fancies them to. each to there own.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 15:26:46
Q for a song
Oo Oo What's sher got to do with :
I'll get my coat.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 21:01:26
😁, to clarify, it was a typo, it should have read Ajer.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Hahahaha I've just seen this thread :-D

25 Jul 2017 00:37:27
isn't Dembele injured and a major doubt.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 08:23:01
Hope big Moussa is being wrapped in cotton wool before Wed if he gets a knock we're down to Ciftci (if he's still around) or a youth player. The shortage of strikers needs to be addressed.

Believable1 Unbelievable0

24 Jul 2017 08:48:20
Stevie was thinking this morning was McGregor used as a striker when on loan at Notts County? Might be wrong on that but he might be an option if needed and not starting in midfield. He has show by playing at left back he is very versatile so that might be an option for this game with Griffiths out.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 09:18:11
sinclair would get moved up.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 09:52:34
I'm sure your right Gordo just looking at what other options we have and it just goes to show the lack of options we have when 1 striker is unavailable.

Agree0 Disagree0

24 Jul 2017 10:11:04
We definitely need to get another striker through the door far to light in that department.

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent