Celtic Banter Archive June 15 2015

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

15 Jun 2015 23:13:51
Any word on a bid for a striker called djuric,plays in seriaA.dont know if there's anythin in it or just paper talk! Looked at his record last year,unimpressed is an understatement! Surely we've learned from bangura and balde?

Believable2 Unbelievable0

15 Jun 2015 23:40:26
Supposedly bid less than €1 and they want €2.5m - €3m.

Agree1 Disagree0

16 Jun 2015 08:13:30
And aye, I did actually mean to type one euro.

Agree0 Disagree0

15 Jun 2015 21:04:14
Agree mate ambrose Forrest and mulgrew need to move on in my opinion

Believable2 Unbelievable5

16 Jun 2015 04:23:26
What is it with some people you are never happy. Players get injured lose form and are human and sometimes make mistakes, Forrest has not been fully fit for Two years and all wingers are inconsistent. Name one who is performing week in week out even Jinky had bad days and he was 25-26 before he started to become world class when Big Jock arrived. Charlie has been POY and an international he has played where ever he has been asked and never complained. Efe too has always given his all for the club I agree he isn't true class and can take wrong options but he is there when wanted and is obviously very popular amongst the other players and coaching staff. Sometimes you are better sticking with what you have and building and improving rather than gambling on something new look at the number of flops we have seen in the last five years.

Agree1 Disagree3

16 Jun 2015 11:23:12
Johnson The idea of moving on. Players who are quite capable of at the very least coming on and doing a job when we have injuries or suspensions doesn't make sense
Jonace is one hundred % right . Mulgrew played for Scotland on Saturday and did very well especially against a big bullying centre forward .
As far as I can gather these 3 players have bought into Deila's tactics and life style , if that is the case it would be madness to move them on , unless we have better squad players signed

Agree1 Disagree1

16 Jun 2015 15:23:42
Chris02 regards mulgrew situation the way I see it is we would be better to move him on, get something for him and reduce wage bill if he is not in RD plans

Agree2 Disagree1

16 Jun 2015 15:46:20
Dn30 Charlie mulgrew has always been in rd plans only injury kept him out.

Agree2 Disagree1

16 Jun 2015 16:05:32
Dan 30 . There are no indications that Mulgrew is not in Deila's plans . Mulgrew has been injured for quite sometime and Deila said he was delighted to see Mulgrew.overcoming his injury before the end of the season .

Agree1 Disagree0

16 Jun 2015 21:10:07
Jim1972 When did he say that? Where will mulgrew fit in?

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Jun 2015 21:49:36
I know you don't go to the games dn30 but look at the stats when fit Ronny played Charlie and has spoken in positive terms about his worth and as soon as he reached fitness he got game time. I would expect to see a lot of Charlie next season unlike you.😉

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Jun 2015 00:33:44
I think it will be a mulgrew and that new man city guy that will be the central defence wiith vvd and denayer offski

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Jun 2015 00:41:21
Jan1972 , you speak a lot of sense .

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Jun 2015 01:26:21
Jim1972 my point is where is he going to fit in? Only position he is good is CB. For me he is a natural in that position, but can't see him getting game there.

Agree0 Disagree0

17 Jun 2015 08:35:20
Dn30 I could see him playing a role at cb or more likely he could replace nir bitton who in my opinion is too slow to nail it down but it would require Charlie to play in a more controlled manner and not look to play overly ambitious passes and keep it simple as Charlie is a better defender than nir. I also wouldn't be surprised to see a lot of rotation in the midfield to keep everyone fresh as I think some players are asked to do too much work(johansson,brown and izzy)but we have to wait and see all the comings and going before being certain.

Agree0 Disagree1

17 Jun 2015 17:52:47
Do 30. It is pointless and stupid for any of us fans to say that a versatile player like Mulgrew can only play in one position and that he isn't going to get a game in that position We only see the players on match days , we are not aware of what specific instructions they are given .n the manager who sees the player in training nearly every day and gives the players instruction , must be a lot better placed than any of us fans to make decisions whether he is wanted or not . If Deila didn't want any of these players that the fans experts want out , he would be pushing them out to free up wages .
Mulgrew cannot be that bad , he was widely praised for playing well in both the Scotland / Ireland games at centre defensive midfield and centre of defence .
Not getting at you DN30, but I think we need to hold on to players like Mulgrew , Forrest and Ambrose , until we are confident that we have back-up players who are better . These three players are fully versed in what RD wants and squad players who are bought in may not adopt to RD , lifestyle and tactics .

Agree0 Disagree1

17 Jun 2015 20:01:35
I can't see Mulgrew being a regular in one position next year, he will only play to cover injuries or to give people a rest IMO. I would totally disagree that Bitton will be replace by Mulgrew, Bitton is by far the better player in tht position I think. Mulgrew when playing in midfield was guilty of giving the ball a lot and Bitton is fr better in posession. I would still keep mulgrew but purely as a verstile back up player

Agree0 Disagree0

15 Jun 2015 17:05:38
I try to never look back with a tinted view. We did what we did and can argue aw day about the minutae. Opinions are not gospel. The gospels aren't even gospel come to think if it. Anyway, it's aw aboot the next two months. That's what we should disagree over. I will start. As long as Ambrose, the signings that went tuts up and Forrest leave, I will be happy.

Believable2 Unbelievable5

15 Jun 2015 22:09:05
Your not going to be happy, Ambrose will stay probably as a back up for centre half and right back, Lustig in particular and Matthews spend to much time out injured.

It is clear the RD sees Forrest as an integral part of his squad and he has been nursed back to something near full fitness. he will definitely be at Celtic park next year

Agree1 Disagree2

15 Jun 2015 22:57:02
What is everyone's problem with forrest ano he's inconsistent but even when he plays good people aren't willing to give him the chance I hope he can get a good run off games and have a full season injury free and win over some of the haters

Agree1 Disagree0

15 Jun 2015 23:41:39
Gordo the problem with Forrest is that he has never lived up to the potential he once showed. Maybe due to injury or maybe due to not being as good as we thought he was.

Forrest is the type of player that niggling injuries will ruin as he depends solely on his pace and with even a slight knock it will hamper is speed. I just don't think he has enough footballing ability to beat a man other than his pace.

He is no longer a young player braking through, he is a first team member who should be offering more but very rarely does.

Agree0 Disagree1

16 Jun 2015 11:48:26
Thank God the success of Celtic is not going to be based on keeping Magicpole happy . Our problem is that we haven't enough players considerably better than the players M p wants rid of th make getting rid of them sensible .

Agree1 Disagree0

16 Jun 2015 14:39:57
It's always sensible to remove all that keeps you mediocre. Get better players, stop buying duds and we move forward.

Hardly a radical plan for success.

Agree1 Disagree0

16 Jun 2015 14:41:33
Watch Forrest closely his final
Baw and finishing are appalling,

Agree0 Disagree1

16 Jun 2015 14:43:54
And I don't believe in the invisible man in the sky either. :)

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Jun 2015 15:24:43
Problem with forrest is he is not good enough

Agree2 Disagree1

16 Jun 2015 16:10:54
Well I think you negative posters on Forrest the problem for you lot is that Deila rates Forrest highly and used last season to help Forrest get over his injuries, hopefully permanently . There are a hell of a lot worse players than Mulgrew Ambrose and Forrest that Celtic would be better moving on first , rather than players who can do a good job for Celtic .

Agree1 Disagree1

15 Jun 2015 14:40:03
this site used to be great with a bit of banter with the eds and other regular posters. Now however their seems to be an element on he here who think that if you don't agree with their opinion yuo must be a sevvy. One poster in particular seems to think he's an authority on everything . Now I have no problem with someone strongly defending their Heros but when it starts to become personal then that's anther thing entirely.

Believable8 Unbelievable2

15 Jun 2015 15:01:34
Thanks for the editing Iwas pretty mad when I wrote it

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - (yes)

15 Jun 2015 15:16:07
Am I that poster u speak of? Is it not personal to come on here and call one of our greatest ever managers overrated and question what he would have won if he hadn't spent money or had henrik! Is that not personal? I'm all for a bit of banter mate and I don't think I know Everythin! And if your question was only do we think MON has been a failure with ROI then I wouldn't have said a word! But when u start callin the man things like overrated,which is complete nonsense! Then I have to speak up! And I'll ask u again,how can a man who has took us into our 1st European final in over 30 years and won us a treble after years of that mob dominating be overrated! It's a simple question!

Agree1 Disagree0

15 Jun 2015 15:50:59
The difference between you and me is I respect your opinion although I don't agree with it in my original post I asked the question has oneill gone backwards as a manager I personally think he has and without johnRobertson at his side he's tacticly inept . On the subject of Seville theirs not a celtic fan alive that won't be forever grateful but that doesn't mean it excuses the mess he left behind as a motivater mon is great as a tactician I don't rate him and never have .

Agree2 Disagree2

15 Jun 2015 16:25:22
that would be the same man who in my opinion cost us that final with some of his decisions and has to take the blame for failing to get OUR TEAM any silverware that season

Agree0 Disagree1

15 Jun 2015 17:29:51
Yeah I read this the other day and I think what the original poster is trying to get across is that MON had a lot more money to spend than most managers and if he had to manage our current team, for instance, then he may not have been as successful, which is a fair point imo. I agree that the man will always be a legend, but think Wiss you may have taken the Proudcelts comments a bit to heart! Both of you make valid points

Agree1 Disagree0

15 Jun 2015 18:42:41
This forum has a small( my estimate 5/6 posters) who seem to have an agreement that they will attack,savage,disrespect any post that one of them does not concur with,while not being an everyday poster,but for sure an everyday reader I am finding this Clique syndrome becoming a little boring. you just need to check/ look at the Forum posts,to see who they are.

Agree3 Disagree1

15 Jun 2015 19:11:29
May you please give a reason for the "Edit"

Agree0 Disagree2

{Ed007's Note - It wasn't acceptable.}

15 Jun 2015 20:47:07
Proudcelt I thought your original post about mon was a tad silly to say if he didn't have Larsson petrov or lambert then he might not have had success, Ronny is being hailed a success by some people but would he have succeeded without Virgil broonie and johansson? I rate the manager on what he produces with the team he has and martin o'neil did a good job as did Gordon strachan.

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Jun 2015 11:51:03
Nobody likes banter more than me , but I found that there are people on here ,who call posters they don't agree with all sorts of names , but can't take criticism back .
Bullies .

Agree1 Disagree1

16 Jun 2015 15:42:29
That's the best laugh of the day 😊 Chris there is no one on the site more intolerant to an alternative view than you . You are constantly disrespectful to people with opposite views to yours and if I'm honest if you spoke to some people out on the street the way you try to belittle people on here who don't agree with you it would probably end up with you getting a punch in the mouth , I don't think the ed would allow people on here to bully and know from experience he will pull posts if he thinks they go to far .

Agree1 Disagree0

17 Jun 2015 18:10:09
Fab 1 , I am surprised at a contributor with your ability doesn't understand that just because a contributor doesn't agree with what another one says. , that doesn't mean he doesn't tolerate the other contributor .
I do find it difficult to be tolerant with the posters who are continuously intolerant with some of our players who have given worthwhile service . If that means I am intolerant that
'S fine I accept it . Fab1 remember you are the poster who for weeks , followed all my posts and criticised them , I never said you were intolerant , I more or less give you a fool's pardon .

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Jun 2015 00:10:16
Chris if I disagree with your post it's because I think you are WRONG about something not because it's you . I will give you an example further up the page you are insinuating that people don't like Ambrose because he is black but don't have the bottle to post it , this is not only insulting to the other posters but says a lot about you , that you are so up your own arse that you can't even comprehend that you might be wrong and he is just not very good at football . So because you rate him and others don't there must be another reason for it .

Agree2 Disagree0

19 Jun 2015 13:29:02
Fab1 has hit the nail on the head! @Chris02 you should be ashamed of yourself, a complete disgrace to celtic fans. Its clear as day that you are insinuating there is a racist reason behind Bhoys and Ghirls not liking Efe, just to be clear he is p*sh at football - doesn't matter what colour his skin is - FYI my fave defender is Big Bobo (im only 25) before you even dare say it takes a racist to know one. I read the page daily, I think I've only ever made one other post but felt the need to reply to your filth. absolute disgrace and I would hope the eds will be removing your account.

Agree0 Disagree0

15 Jun 2015 13:41:12
I asked last week I think it was about the dates of the pre-season fixtures. I've just found out that Celtic TV will be showing all 5 fixtures. If you're like myself and like going on holiday and like to catch a game in the sun (with a cold beer) then you should be able to at a celtic/irish bar.

Believable0 Unbelievable1

15 Jun 2015 10:56:20
I see that john mcginn has instigated legal proceedings against st mirren over the spike incident, I actually heard from a friend at the time of the incident that rather than being a prank, he and Thompson were having a heated discussion over sevco and their predicament at the time of the "accident" , and the only reason he never pressed charges was Gilmour told him Thomson would be disciplined internally. Is this really the type of guy bbc should be spending tax payers money to use as a pundit?

Believable0 Unbelievable1

15 Jun 2015 13:30:44
Your friend could be completely wrong to be fair.

Agree1 Disagree0

15 Jun 2015 15:11:38
Absolutely kevbhoy just passing on a RUMOUR on what is , yes you guessed it a rumour site , but thanks for your input .

Agree0 Disagree0

15 Jun 2015 15:30:11
You pretty much said he shouldn't be working for the BBC even though you have nothing to suggest your mate's story has a shred of truth to it.

Agree0 Disagree0

15 Jun 2015 16:02:13
Sorry kev I felt the full stop and question mark would have made it clear enough that I was putting it up for debate and as the post is on a Rumour site then the fact it was a rumour would have been infered are you supposed to start every post on a Rumour site with **rumour alert **** just for the tiny percentage of people who can't work out that posts on a rumour site are exactly that a rumour . Once again thanks for your input , and just for the removal of any doubt the vast majority of things you will read on these pages will be rumours and that's no rumour .

Agree0 Disagree0

15 Jun 2015 17:41:12
Rumours are simply the truth that probably never happens. I wonder if someone who, in their 40's perhaps, still living at home with their maw, great gamer, might want to do an analysis of all the rumours and see how many work out.

If their no too busy. :)

I will guess under 1%.

Agree0 Disagree0

15 Jun 2015 18:45:40
No need to get upset fab1, just thought you were being a bit unfair on him.

Agree0 Disagree0

15 Jun 2015 19:52:07
Not upset in the slightest kev , but I will admit I don't understand the concept of how you can ever be unfair to an ex rangers player , lol. You might need to explain that one to me 😁

Agree0 Disagree0

15 Jun 2015 20:50:03
Haha that's a fair one fab1

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Jun 2015 11:53:32
Some people on here may disagree with you fab1 , I certainly am not one of them .

Agree1 Disagree0

 
Change Consent