Celtic Rumours Archive April 19 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

19 Apr 2012 21:48:30
Keith Jacksons best sport journalist ? WTF......TTTS

Believable5 Unbelievable18

19 Apr 2012 21:41:14
Well well then, sfa guilty of lying again, it's about time we take petition to uefa as fans, demanding an inquiry into the treatment of Celtic fc by the national association, we should insist on a move to another country in order to gain fairness and equality, we should also look at pulling out the Scottish cup too, hit them back harder, cheating b:stard/.(newbhoy)

Believable15 Unbelievable7

Don't get caught up in the hype
it wasn't THE SFA!
it was 2 guys, with 'slightly' different versions of the same story, which was enough to get him off the full charge.
Neil was still out of order (not for the first time) take the blinkers off - he's embarrassing - even his own players were backing off him at the end of the Hearts game ffs!

Agree0 Disagree0

As much as i'd love to find out that officials have lied, as of yet, they haven't. Two people submitting two different versions of what they witnessed doesn't necessarily mean anybody has lied. {Ed007's Note - Doesn't it? Ask Dougie McDonald about that. The part about swearing was what the entire case hinged on, the linesman said he did and the referee said he didn't, one of them was lying, no matter how you want to dress it up.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Is that you being impartial Ed? {Ed007's Note - Just as impartial as you. I don't need to be impartial and what I have stated is facts. Are you being impartial Bill72? You post sensible stuff and sign your name, then post stuff from a totally different viewpoint without signing off, have you not got the minerals to stand by everything you say. You want a pat on the back for coming across as a decent Rangers fan, but your true colours show through on your anonymous posts.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Well actually it could depend on who saw more could it be that the lineaments heard him swearing then the referee missed that part easy done but then again that's not how it works cuz it's against celtic {Ed007's Note - Well the SFA didn't accept either the referee'e or the linesman's version of events. Officials leave the field and go up the tunnel together, and it was the referee NL was accused of shouting and swearing at.}

Agree0 Disagree0

BILL72

Of course someone was lying. The Linesman said that Lennon was swearing at the ref, and even inclused it in his report.

The ref said he didnt, and included this in his report

They are always going to take the refs side because it was he, who was APPARENTLY abused

The linesman was shown to have lied, and the Gaffer got off with a ludicrous charge


Samson

Agree0 Disagree0

Just noticed 90% of the posts are unsigned

Just thought I'd mention it!

You know who I am?

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Apr 2012 21:25:28
Ed do you think Celtic will just take the whole tunnelgate affair as green jhedi put it on the chin or do you think there is more to come,and will it still be bigger than Dougiegate.MACCA {Ed007's Note - There is more that can come out. It just depends how far the SFA are willing to push CFC in any 'fight'.}

Believable7 Unbelievable3

Would love to know what Matt Mc Glone knows ...What ever it is it has the Sweet F All sh@#ing themselves ....TTTS

Agree0 Disagree0

Oh no! another 'dossier'

don't you think we look a bit daft pursuing this - - if every club went to this length to challenge every decision by authority there would be no SFA or SPL
then again that might not be a bad thing ;-)

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Apr 2012 21:12:41
Evening Ed, is there any link to a story about the linesman lying. Cheers

St Mikey {Ed007's Note - You will need to wait for the official report, if it is released. Nobody is saying the linesman lied, the linesman and the referee reports had two different versions of events, the linesman said NL swore four times and the referee said he hadn't swore.}

Believable11 Unbelievable2

Awrite Cheers Ed.

St Mikey {Ed007's Note - :-)

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed, your reply is obviously legally based but its obvious someone is lying here. If you know some inside info can you share and let the masses know if we're to take this further. A yes or no will suffice (unless you want to private message!) {Ed007's Note - Anything I did know and could back it without incriminating anyone I would say. I tend not to get too involved in gossip, sorry. I have legal guidelines to follow.}

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Apr 2012 20:43:29
I wouldn't normally post about refs & the SFA but that's now twice in 2 seasons that officials have been known to lie involving celtic. How many more cases are there ?

Just saying ~ Mrs E

Believable9 Unbelievable2

And twice that CFC had to hire prominant QC's to get justice of sorts at an SFA hearing. On both occasions SFA ran scared. Lat year it was clear they had run a kangaroo court - to the extent they wanted to scrap the heairng and start again. An offer refused by CFC. today thier own legal man intervened to stop them making fools of themselves, if they hadn't already. It was a trumped up charge by a trumped up oficial who ought to be subject of investigation for his deception. I wouldnt justify all of NL's actions but is it any wonder he felt it personal or felt aggrieved at Hampden. Have an of his detractors considered that it is hard to keep perspective when you KNOW lies have been told about you just a couple of weeks previous?

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree completely with the above. Mr Lennon is subject to the most wicked personal bad will from some sections of officialdom. Mr Brines is in my opinion is an official who delights in telling off our manager. He usually has an aggressive look when he does and is now involved in more controversy. Much has been said of how Mr Lennon must understand he is no longer a player but now the manager of one of the most well supported and famous clubs in the world; it would be nice if the SFA officials also reminded themselves they cannot deal with Mr Lennon as if he was still a player. Some seem to think they are more important than him on match day!! To finish on a high note I have to say I watched the AM V Valencia last night and our SFA officials did a good job....pity they cant seem to control a Scottish game with the same degree of authority and fairness.....Although IMO is about the best of the bunch re ability and approach regarding CFC. Sopot Celt

Agree0 Disagree0

Think your being a bit disingenuous withe Dun Utd situation - - it wasn't a penalty!! - - so the referee made the correct decision.

Being shouted and snarled at in private later he may have said something to get Neil out of the room,
but at the end of the day the decision was correct. {Ed007's Note - He may have said something to get NL out of the room but then again he may not have. You can't surmise what happened, we could all do that to suit our own agenda. For all you know the referee and the officials may have cooked up their own story to cover their incompetence, see I surmised that....oh wait, that is what happened.}

Agree0 Disagree0

In your unbiased opinion perhaps {Ed007's Note - I never gave an opinion there Bill72. You are assuming/imagining things that happened or could have happened. I stated facts again Bill of what actually did happen. Where in that is there any of my opinion Bill72? As an ex referee surely you know about being unbiased Bill, but yet again that is only in posts that you sign.}

Agree0 Disagree0

Ed - sorry if i touched a sore point - being biased or not is irrelevant in this case - -you were not there and as such cannot say 'what actually happened' - apologies if I haven't signed all posts - not intentional

bill72 {Ed007's Note - But you weren't there either and you said what 'may' have happened. So you can't actually say what did or didn't happen. So it's ok for you to surmise and say what 'may' have happened but I can't say what did actually happen according to official reports? Sorry, it doesn't work like that.}

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Apr 2012 20:36:06
In light of what i would call "tunnel gate", Lenny seems to be justified in his "it's personal" statement.The thought of a linesman blatantly lying must not be swept under the carpet.More interesting though is the news that Vincent Lunney had to take Mr Ogg,QC outside rather than blow the charge wide open.Is it any wonder Lenny wanted things done on the pitch last week? One way of stopping lies and cover up's is to do it in public.............green jhedi

Believable12 Unbelievable1

19 Apr 2012 19:55:27
So Neil has been banned for two matches, am I correct in saying that is for the motherwell and rangers games? Also I have no doubt that they will on later hearings attempt to ban him for the hearts game so he can't be on the touchline on the day we lift the trophy


Junglebhoy33

Believable10 Unbelievable2

19 Apr 2012 19:08:03
Hopefully it's brines that has lied and he gets the sack. Has there ever been a worse ref? And it's not that he is biased to any one team, ask rangers fans what they of brines.

He is just awful. How the hell did he get to become a top referee?!

Believable10 Unbelievable0

Because he looks like Jean-Claude Van Damme.

Agree0 Disagree0

Lies lies and more damn lies....and they
call us paranoid?
Do you not find it strange that in the fast few weeks we have a season jounalist from south of the border, on the outside looking in, can, with no affiliation to any of the Old firm, be shunned and ridiculed for asking pertinant questions of what is going on with out neighbours in the West,what is really needed is MORE journalists from the South joining their colleague to investigate the footballing establishment in this country opening them up for scrutiny, displaying their agenda that has been going on for DECADES and DECADES....lets have them open that can of worms and see how they come out of it, so WE all have a level playing field to run our National Sport. the Glasgow media Mafia are not brave enough to do it....

Agree0 Disagree0

From a Rangers fan - I agree with the posting - Brines is by far the most inept and incompetent referee I've ever seen. Ther has been many dodgy decisions given by him against all times including us but by far the most rediculous decision was NOt giving Celtic that penalty against St. johnston last season when the defender not only handled the ball but also picked it up!! That decision itself should have consigned him to the dust bin. As for the other poster - I'm still trying to work out the Van Damm link - is it because Brines talks to his nipples? :) {Ed007's Note - I've been wondering that but it can't be. If his nipple spoke to him or vice versa then they would have had the same story today :-) You are bang on with your assessment of his refereeing though mate.}

Agree0 Disagree0

It's good we've finally managed to agree on something Ed :) By the way despite our differing allegiencies this is a great site and it contains (in the main) a lot of sensible and poignant posts - well done guys! {Ed007's Note - Thanks mate.}

Agree0 Disagree0

I am a celtic fan and i used to referee with common sense good humour and total fairness. if referees and assistant referees make mistakes like for example the scottish cup semi final against the sc#m of edinburgh they should be brought into hampden in front of john fleming and banned for 3 games and sent for more coaching on how to handle big time games. these referees are getting away scott free without anyone challenging them and if fleming is not doing his job sack him. there has been to many poor performances from these so called want to be referees.

Agree0 Disagree0

Rangers fan - coming in peace
brines is and always was a person - even my wife, a fellow season ticket holder, knows what to expect from him when she sees his name in the programme.
However - I do not think he is dishonest - yes he is incompetent. But, we cannot continue to GET RID of referees - - theres no-one to replace them!!

bill72

Agree0 Disagree0

Rangers fan again -
to the Celtic fan who was a referee -- i was also a referee, as far as the Hearts game goes -
1 hooper was offside
2 ball hit webster hip - not his hand
3 how many celtic players hand does the ball have to hit before a penalty is given?

In my opinion the referee had a good game - -e.g he could & should have sent off black & brown (& I'm not racist) both for persistent and in some cases violent fouls

bill72 {Ed007's Note - That's what I like to see Bill, a referee resorting to form and only looking at CFC things with a token gesture against the opposition :-)

Agree0 Disagree0

Good grief man

i thought i would get replies from the dark side not ticked by the ED

consider me put in my place ;-))

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Apr 2012 19:04:23
So once again a linesman lies against Lenny.Lino's report says he swore four times to the ref,Ref's report says he did not swear.And they say we are paranoid conspiracy theorists!What will the lino's punishment be for making up stories?..............green jhedi

Believable11 Unbelievable2

Enjoying yourself over on twitter sir?.....TTTS

Agree0 Disagree0

What if its the ref that Lied and the assistant told the truth? ...............You and I were not there so how then can you or I make coment on what is or is not the truth..............unless you or I are paranoid.
Wibblyblue

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Apr 2012 18:58:41
Can't believe the abuse that knob gave Pat, just as I was starting to pick up what he was saying lol. Ignore it mate, they do it to everybody, if you actually come on the sites for a laugh and banter you get attacked, happened to me on a different site last week. I find it funny how tough so many people are over a keyboard. What's taking so long with Lennon Ed, or have I missed something?
JFT96
Smithy {Ed007's Note - That's is the hearing finished Smithy. A 2 game ban for the League Cup Final and nothing for what happened at Ibrox. The referee and the linesman had contradicting reports and the case was 'riddled with lies'. It seems a bit less than the 17 match ban the media up here were predicting.}

Believable4 Unbelievable1

Smithy, I said I was surprised wee Pat rose to it, usually he just laughs it off. Do you notice how these "brave" guys never have a name? Anyway liverpool for the cup......
ED007, 2 match ban, but they have Lennon up on other charges, any bets that any other bans will be 4 or 5 at a time, they are gunning for him, and sadly he is giving them the excuse. Timalloy

Agree0 Disagree0

Are there any charges to answer for Semi Final match so much going on i missed that ....TTTS {Ed007's Note - There are other hearings due mate.}

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Apr 2012 18:47:39
Neil Lennon has been given a two-game touchline ban by a Scottish Football Association tribunal.

Lennon was called to appear before the panel following incidents at the League Cup final against Kilmarnock and the Glasgow derby against Rangers at Ibrox.

The Celtic manager had publicly criticised referee Willie Collum’s decision to book Anthony Stokes for diving rather than award a penalty during the cup final defeat.

He was also cited for an alleged incident during half-time at Ibrox involving match official Calum Murray. Both Murray and his fourth official at that match, Iain Brines, were present at Hampden for the hearing.

Lennon was accused of breaching rules 68 and 203 of the Scottish FA’s judicial panel protocol.

Rules

Rule 68 states: “No recognised football body, club, official, Team Official or other member of Team Staff, player or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA, shall in an interview, a ‘blog’ on the internet, on a social networking or micro-blogging site, or in any other manner calculated or likely to lead to publicity (i) criticise the performance(s) of any or all match official(s) in such a way as to indicate bias or incompetence on the part of such match official; or (ii) make remarks about such match official(s) which impinge on his character.”

Rule 203 stipulates: “No member of Team Staff shall commit Misconduct at a match, including but not limited to committing acts of the kind described in the Schedule of Offences in Annex C (including where there is aggravation by any factor, including but not limited to prolongation of the incident; combination of different offences; continued use of offensive, abusing and/ or insulting language and/or behaviour; calling a match official a cheat and/ or calling a match official’s integrity into question; failure to comply with a match official’s requests; adoption of aggressive behaviour towards a match official; any racist, sexist, sectarian and/or otherwise discriminatory element; and the degree of any physical violence), breaching the Post Match Protocol and committing Unacceptable Conduct.”

Jungle Bhoy.

Believable2 Unbelievable1

19 Apr 2012 18:53:02
Brines and Muarry have lied ...lets see ssb wheel out dallas and co now... It is personal .....TTTS

Believable9 Unbelievable1

19 Apr 2012 18:50:22
Lennon cleared of tunnel incident which surely means officals lied? ....And we're told it isnt personal ....TTTS {Ed007's Note - The linesman's report stated NL swore four times, the referees report stated NL never swore. Seems a bit strange that two officials can have two different versions of events.......oh wait a minute, not up here it isn't, silly me. Vincent Lunny took the CFC QC Derek Ogg out of the the hearing to to save the SFA from the mess they found themselves in. The case was 'riddled with lies'.}

Believable7 Unbelievable1

After the untimely death of Paul McBride who carried out fantastic legal work for Celtic, it is great to see the club instructing such a high profile and competent QC in Derek Ogg.

Agree0 Disagree0

How many of the Shame will now come on and agree that Lennon has been unfairly treated.

Or criticise the whispering slug of a manager they have.

Agree0 Disagree0

Shame - - lately you could have me there
Lennon - unfairly treated - -you having a laugh?
slug of a manager - - says more about you i think

bill72

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Apr 2012 18:11:55
Just seen the Kuyt rumour below, and thought I'd give my opinion. I'm sure Ed002 said he would cost more than 3 million a couple of days ago so he wouldn't be only 1 million, but still a good price, he has a big wage, but he loves playing football and I'm sure he'd take a cut to play football regularly. The problem you would have is that there is intrest from Italy, Germany and his home town, boyhood club Feyernoord. He'd be an excellent signing though, he's a favourite of mine just for the effort he puts in and the amount of times he has scored in the big games. I'm sure he'd score frequently in Scotland, and be a great player for you if he did join.
JFT96
Smithy

Believable6 Unbelievable3

Can't believe this guy can't get a game at Liverpool. Technically very good, scores important goals, can play in several positions and gives 100%. How players such as Henderson, Adam, Downing and Carroll are ahead of him, God only knows.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Apr 2012 18:09:33
A small number of VIP packages are still available as the Thai Tims & Friends perform at the Glasgow Royal Concert Hall on Thursday, May 10.

The package includes a drinks reception and buffet at the venue. Refreshments pre-show and during the interval are also provided.

Join us in welcoming these remarkable children that the Celtic family have taken to their hearts.

To book or for more information please email matchdayhospitality@celticfc.co.uk or telephone 0871 226 1888* (Option 4).

* Calls cost up to 10p per minute, telecoms provider dependent. Mobile and other provider charges may vary.

Jungle Bhoy.

Believable3 Unbelievable1

19 Apr 2012 18:03:53
I think it's absolutely disgusting that Joe Ledely has not been nominated for PLayer of the year! He's been fantastic for us this year! Mr Consistant and chipped in with important goals ( the shame, Rennes away etc) He really is our unsung hero! Plus Steve Davis are you kidding, even the great unwashed slaughtered his form this season! What do you think guys and ed??

Ice man {Ed007's Note - I thought Ledley would have been nominated as well.}

Believable8 Unbelievable2

Total agree. Both Davis and Sheilds have been average at best this season. Also surprised Wanyama hasnt had a nomination in either award.
Daz the Hoopy

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Apr 2012 16:44:22
Any news on Lennons case today? {Ed007's Note - There is no word as yet.}

Believable0 Unbelievable0

19 Apr 2012 15:53:59
I see people are posting with regards to potential signings/releases/sales for next season. Yakubu has been mentioned on here a few times.
Not for me - but what about a 31 year old, experienced internationalist. He can play up front, off the front 2 or wide. (would give sammy some competition). A proven track record of performing and scoring in BIG games - including the Champions League final. he would definitely help our young players in Europe. He is rumoured to be sold in the summer for only £1M.......Dirk Kuyt.
What do you think Ed? (or anyone else). I think he would be a cracking signing. He's got plenty of football left in him - Liverpool have not been using him too much - hence the low fee. kbt1978 {Ed007's Note - I like Kuyt but I doubt we would be able to afford his wages.}

Believable5 Unbelievable2

Kuyt would be a great signing,depending on wages.im sure ed or smithy(lfc) will know this but he funds an orphanage abroad i think so money might not be his main driving force.interesting.........green jhedi {Ed007's Note - He is on 65k a week just now, and like Bellamy he will need to keep his wages at a level to support his charity work.}

Agree0 Disagree0

I doubt we could afford his wages but I think that would be a really great signing who can make a difference in europe. wouldn't mind dermott subsidising his wages for a few years

Agree0 Disagree0

A nice thought but there is a great danger in bringing in this type of player. I like Kuyt a lot "He loves this City" but I would rather bring in 3 new young guys who are good prospects than DK. Russel, Rhodes and I thought it ridiculous a few weeks ago but Daly has scored a stack of goals so why not if he is within our budget. Also I hear his philanthropic work only involves his time and he does not want to compete with Carnegie and demand a wage which could fund the public libraries of Scotland as some seem to.....Sopot Celt

Agree0 Disagree0

They are decent players but no better than what we have. Rhodes would cost maybe 7M if a few bids went in (West Ham have been sniffing all season).
My point is we need that bit of experience and class that can rub off on a young side. You always need a blend and all due respect to John Daly and Johnny Russell - they won't provide it.
kbt1978

Agree0 Disagree0

I see where you are coming from but FL had experience and so did DDublin and the younger ones Junhino and Gravesen and all were flops. I dont think you need experience as a striker in the way you need experience as a CB. You know where the net is or you dont. I do agree we need a bit of experience in the side its just that we have a poor history of bringing in guys with experience who are goalscorers and I think as I have said that experience is better served at the back. I am also a great believer in developing young players and giving them a chance...look at Hooper and FF and Wanyama. I also agree 7m is far too much for Rhodes with that sort of money you could pick up a top man from the Bundisliga. We may lose Hooper so he is one we have to replace and I think there will also be a few surprise movers out of the club. (no proof just my hunch). Sopot Celt. PS IMHO Daly and Russel are underrated.

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Apr 2012 15:00:01
Just heard nominees for player of the year Big Charlie agree, Jon Daly joint top scorer agree , Steven Davis , Dean Shiels FFS why no Fraser Forster who has most shutouts and has been outstanding . Not heard the young ones yet but surely Forest and Wanyama must be in with a shout.......DH

Believable2 Unbelievable2

The choice of Steive Davies (average)is a strange one considering that he wouldnt even have been at the club if the dodgers had been working within their means....TTTS

Agree0 Disagree0

Wanyama is not there but forrest is. The list is James Forrest, Kenny McLean, Gary Mackay-Steven and Johnny Russell

Agree0 Disagree0

19 Apr 2012 14:46:15
Listening to andy wa*er last night ripping into joe ledley last night about tweeting leg gash, then said he had 90mins to sort any player out on the park, what did this little man mean? i liked him when he played for us although shouldnt have had the second chance in 94 to resign for us. I for one would not let the little c back near our door even for work with this scottish media. ,..,.,.,kbarry

Believable10 Unbelievable2

19 Apr 2012 13:20:46
Hi Ed , 5 games left , only one of them meaningful , it is time to give fringe players a run out to see what they can do with next season in mind , strongest team in old firm game , but players such as Paddy McCourt , Pawel Brozek , Rabiu Ibrahim , Filip Twardzik , Dylan McGeouch , Andre Blackman , Mickael Lustig , Emilio Izaguirre along with Efrain Juarez and Morten Rasmussen should be given game time to see who stays and who goes , Rasmussen and Juarez at least deserve a chance to say goodbye , the league is won time to plan ahead . {Ed007's Note - I would think that a few of the young players will get game time in the run in.}

Believable4 Unbelievable3

19 Apr 2012 00:34:55
Tune of : Nasty Little Green Men by Classix Nouveaux .

There's been a sighting in dear old Govan ,
They've been seen around Ibrox too ,
Un identified men in black suits ,
So they're telling us on the news .

Oh so many are speculating ,
Giving so much fuel to our "Scribes" ,
If those Taxmen really landed ,
Well now , how would it change your lives ?

Will they be , nasty little Taxmen ?
Will they be , friend or enemy ?
Will they be , there to take your money ?
Will they be , just like you and me ?

Would the SFA choose to warn us ?
If the truth couldn't be denied ,
Though Salmond says he's seen them ,
We know yous will just run and hide ,

While so many are speculating ,
Giving so much fuel to our "Scribes"
When these Taxmen are really landing ,
Well now , how will it change your lives ?

Will they be , nasty little Taxmen ?
Will they be , friend or enemy ?
Will they be , there to grab you're money ?
Will they be , just like you and me ?

Will they be , like boring old accountants ?
Will they be , like the burd off Countdown on TV ?
Will they be , all over yous like the measles ?
Or will they be , just like you and me ? Hey
Drewzybhoy

Believable2 Unbelievable5

19 Apr 2012 00:33:04
Three words.Paul mcconvilles latest blog...........green jhedi

Believable2 Unbelievable1

That's 4 words bud!

Agree0 Disagree0

Sorry mate 1. Paul 2.McConville 3.Latest 4.Blog

Agree0 Disagree0

What does the blog say mate?
cant find or access it.

BluePeter

Agree0 Disagree0

4 words. D'oh!

Agree0 Disagree0

Any advance on three? Do I hear four? Anyone? Anyone?

Sorry green jhedi, Ed, but I couldn't help myself, lol!

Brian

Agree0 Disagree0

Okay.gotta take it on the chin here! i added the word latest as an afterthought.knew i would get a kicking as soon as i posted it...........green jhedi

Agree0 Disagree0

For those looking for it -

scotslawthoughts.wordpress.com/2012/04/18/when-will-rangers-in-administration-run-out-of-money/

Evinguu

Agree0 Disagree0

Is 'Paul McConville' not classed as one word being a proper noun?

Agree0 Disagree0

'Paul' is a proper noun. 'McConville' is also a proper noun. 1 plus 1 = ?

To put it in perspective using your methodology: Adolph Blaine Charles David Earl Frederick Jack Gerald Hubert Irvin John Kenneth Lloyd Martin Nero Oliver Paul Quincy Randolph Sherman Thomas Uncas Victor William Xerxes Yancy Zeus Wolfeschlegelsteinhausenbergerdorft Senior, the person with the longest recorded name in the world (can't believe he is actually called Adolf, couldn't make it up-lol), is also a singular proper noun. Surely not, but I will gladly stand corrected if proven wrong.

Brian

Agree0 Disagree0

Brian, Thinking of names i was leafing through a girls baby name book a fair few moons ago. And it had Adolf and B*stard listed as girls names! now i expect this was someone at the printers taking the michael but i found it amusing and insisted when I have a wee girl her name shall be B*starding Adolf Salimimba (the surname being my Evinguu persona's surname yes i am sad enough to give that a surname), childish I know but hey if you cant be a 6 foot child what can you be?


Evinguu

Agree0 Disagree0

 
Change Consent