03 Feb 2019 20:00:24
Having watched Sportscene tonight and saw their "penalties" compared to our Burke one whci was not given.
It is a JOKE not one of their penalties came close to the tackle that wiped out Burke.
03 Feb 2019 22:38:31
Burke's wasn't a penalty Tim, the St Johnstone defender clearly got a touch on the ball. Could possibly of had a penalty for the foul on Christie just before Edouard got Injured. On Edouard's injury I thought it was accidental, the St Johnstone defender got the ball but it was the follow through that caught Eddy.
Having saw their penalties, the first was a stonewaller no doubt. The second was a dive and Dallas was conned. The third was just outside the box and to be fair to Dallas he originally gave a free kick and it was the linesman that called it a penalty. The fourth was clearly outside the box.
On another note I was impressed with Zander Clark looks a decent keeper. Would be a decent back up/ challenge to Bain. Most saves and clean sheets in the league this season.
03 Feb 2019 23:23:07
Sorry disagree with tackle on Eddy, it was reckless with studs showing. It's a foul possibly even red but definitely a yellow regardless of intent. Also think challenge on Burke was ball played through man which is also a foul on a clear goal scoring opportunity so it's a penalty and a red for me. The tackles going unpunished on our players is past disgraceful. A message has been sent to all teams who play us. It's ok to kick our players and dive yourself if challenged.
04 Feb 2019 09:03:04
malkybhoy. how refreshing to see a tic fan without green googles
the burke one he won ball, edourds injury is just unlucky as its a forceful tackle but not a foul, the christie one i can see being given more often than not
as for our pens
1. stonewaller
2. very soft but can see why given although defoe owned up
3. its a close call, def a handball but could have been given as free kick any othe day
4. foul starts outside box but continues into the area so ref has every right to gvie pen according to the laws of game
biggest problem was st mirren players giving the ref a descicon to make with some stupid tackles.
04 Feb 2019 10:06:47
Nothing annoys me more than someone forming an opinion with blue/ green tinted specs onðŸ‘.
04 Feb 2019 10:55:13
@Malkybhoy nothing annoys me more than a sychophant trying to suck up.
Be honest, if the Burke tackle was on Morelos, we all know it would havwe resulted in a penalty.
It is guys like you that give the cheats an "out"
04 Feb 2019 11:43:38
Bit ironic malky you've gave a thumbs up to a guy forming his opinion with red blue n white specs with orange lenses in them.
04 Feb 2019 11:44:16
Sycophant? Who am I trying to suck up to and what advantage will I gain by doing so? Why don't you just do what your good at and posts fantasy stories about your fantasy friends and a talking suit😂😂😂 leave the constructive debating to the grown upsðŸ‘.
04 Feb 2019 12:15:09
Dasa77 there is nothing about alwayscheated's posts that suggests he has his "red, blue and white specs with orange lenses in them" on or maybe you are unawre of the correct definition of the word " ironic"ðŸ‘.
04 Feb 2019 13:24:28
Intent does not matter when it comes to fouls. When determining what action to take the referee has to determine if the challenge was careless (no caution) , reckless (yellow card) or excessive force (red card) .
Contact is also irrelevant as a player can slide in with excessive force but fail to make contact. When that happens it is still a red card for using excessive force.
04 Feb 2019 13:27:52
thought if went into a tackle with the studs shown it was a foul if so then the tackle that got eddy was a penalty.