Celtic banter 38930


Use our rumours form to send us celtic transfer rumours.

(single word yields best result)

01 May 2018 15:00:52
Disappointed with Celtic under 17 last night looks like the team is based on physical strength rather than skill
Rangers had 3 or 4 good skilful players
Celtic players were big physical and cumbersome no standouts.

Agree1 Disagree2

01 May 2018 16:35:42
Gerryd I think you are being a bit harsh on the under 17s considering they had to play 80 plus minutes with 10 men following a borderline ordering off and a dubious penalty against them, also they had to make seven changes to the team. oldkilly.

01 May 2018 19:32:05
Even with the decisions we looked a poor team not like us at all.

01 May 2018 20:22:09
I haven't watched the under 17s much and don't really want to criticise based on last night. However do agree the sevco players did seem to have 3 or 4 players worth keeping an eye on. Even taking into account the 10 men don't think anyone really caught the eye.

01 May 2018 20:48:09
I thought the same team looked massive no skill or flair. Passing was really bad definitely no standouts in under 17's.

01 May 2018 21:01:11
Hasn't there been a few Rangers youths who have moved to Celtic in the past, maybe The rangers will keep up the tradition, the bit I saw of the game the Celtic Bhoys looked a bit bigger than The rangers boys, what's that old saying about a good little un will always beat a good big un.

01 May 2018 21:56:38
Aindoh, that must be an old radio saying. I won't panic about our under age footballers just yet 5 Glasgow Cups out of 6 isn't too bad . Size of players at under 17 isn't really significant as many haven't stopped growing at that age .
I would be delighted if we produced more big strong youth players who can play well, as over the last number of years most of our top midfield and atacking academie players have been on the small or slight side.



Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass